mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Embedded Conditional Independence Tests for Large Language Model Generated Text with an Application to German Parliament Speeches

arXiv 2609.00946 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2026stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conditional independence tests (CITs) test for conditional dependence between two random objects X and Y given a third random object Z. Existing CITs have limited applicability to high-dimensional data, especially multimodal data like text. However, we show that such tests are of interest for large language model (LLM) outputs, where we test whether an output X generated from a source text Z carries information about an attribute Y beyond Z itself. For this purpose, we propose embedded CITs (eCITs), which embed X and Z and apply an existing CIT to the resulting representations and to Y. We show that, provided the embedding of Z is sufficient, i.e. retains the information Z carries about either Y or the representation of X, the null hypothesis transfers from X and Z to their representations, so that a CIT valid for the embedded hypothesis is valid for the original one. We further give conditions for equivalence of the two hypotheses, and show that sufficiency weakens to mean sufficiency when the embedded test targets conditional mean independence. We propose a semi-synthetic simulation design to assess type I error (T1E) control and power of the eCITs for given embedding maps on a specific dataset and task, and use it to evaluate them on our application. Applying the eCITs to German Parliament speeches, we find for all combinations of embedding maps considered that the summaries of two LLMs contain information about the speaker's faction and gender beyond the speech they were generated from.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 31 references.

References · 19

  1. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  2. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
  3. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
  4. 2022Matryoshka Representation Learningcited by 282
  5. 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
  6. 2023A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 95
  7. 2024NV-Retriever: Improving text embedding models with effective hard-negative miningcited by 84
  8. 2017Approximate Kernel-based Conditional Independence Tests for Fast Non-Parametric Causal Discoverycited by 76
  9. 2024LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challengescited by 73
  10. 2017Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methodscited by 49
  11. 2022BERTScore is Unfair: On Social Bias in Language Model-Based Metrics for Text Generationcited by 48
  12. 2020A general framework for inference on algorithm-agnostic variable importancecited by 45
7 more
  1. 2024The Impossibility of Fair LLMscited by 22
  2. 2022The Projected Covariance Measure for assumption-lean variable significance testingcited by 16
  3. 2021Significance tests of feature relevance for a black-box learnercited by 15
  4. 2025New Encoders for German Trained from Scratch: Comparing ModernGBERT with Converted LLM2Vec Modelscited by 5
  5. 2024Deep Nonparametric Conditional Independence Tests for Imagescited by 3
  6. 2022Test and Measure for Partial Mean Dependence Based on Machine Learning Methodscited by 2
  7. 2026On the Robustness of Multilingual Text Embedding Rankings Across Learning Tasks, Languages, and Benchmark Datasetscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.