mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Significance tests of feature relevance for a black-box learner

arXiv 2103.04985 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2021stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An exciting recent development is the uptake of deep neural networks in many scientific fields, where the main objective is outcome prediction with the black-box nature. Significance testing is promising to address the black-box issue and explore novel scientific insights and interpretation of the decision-making process based on a deep learning model. However, testing for a neural network poses a challenge because of its black-box nature and unknown limiting distributions of parameter estimates while existing methods require strong assumptions or excessive computation. In this article, we derive one-split and two-split tests relaxing the assumptions and computational complexity of existing black-box tests and extending to examine the significance of a collection of features of interest in a dataset of possibly a complex type such as an image. The one-split test estimates and evaluates a black-box model based on estimation and inference subsets through sample splitting and data perturbation. The two-split test further splits the inference subset into two but require no perturbation. Also, we develop their combined versions by aggregating the p-values based on repeated sample splitting. By deflating the bias-sd-ratio, we establish asymptotic null distributions of the test statistics and the consistency in terms of Type II error. Numerically, we demonstrate the utility of the proposed tests on seven simulated examples and six real datasets. Accompanying this paper is our Python library dnn-inference (https://dnn-inference.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) that implements the proposed tests.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.

Builds on

13 of 64 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  4. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
  5. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  6. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  7. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
  8. 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 431
  9. 2017Non-convex learning via Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics: a nonasymptotic analysiscited by 242
  10. 2015Escaping From Saddle Points --- Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decompositioncited by 241
  11. 2019Universal Inferencecited by 43
  12. 2016Facial Expression Recognition using Convolutional Neural Networks: State of the Artcited by 17
1 more
  1. 2018The Holdout Randomization Test for Feature Selection in Black Box Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: