Text Capability Loss in Vision-Language Adaptation: An Attention-Sink Diagnosis
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning a pretrained LLM into a vision-language model (VLM) can erode the backbone's text capability, with the damage concentrated on tasks that require following exact output rules, such as instruction following, chain-of-thought reasoning graded on a strictly parsed final answer, and similar evaluations with strict graders. We trace this gap to attention-sink corruption: VL fine-tuning perturbs the early sink position that anchors a large fraction of attention probability, and how well the base LLM preserves its sink tracks how much of the affected capability survives adaptation. Building on this view, we introduce Sink Strength, a single scalar computed on the base LLM in a few seconds on a single GPU that predicts post-VL degradation without any VL training. It consistently tracks relative degradation across the six VLM-LLM pairs and multiple format-sensitive tasks. Complementing this diagnostic, we find that post-pretraining QK-RMSNorm injection fails to reproduce the protection of native QK-RMSNorm, while several off-the-shelf weight-merging settings fail to recover the lost capability after VL training. These negative results underscore the value of screening backbones with Sink Strength before VL training and narrow the intervention space toward head-selective training-time protection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
36 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency25 Aug
- 2024Training-Free Mitigation of Language Reasoning Degradation After Multimodal Instruction Tuning4 Dec
Other references · 34
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
22 more
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
- 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
- 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 822
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
- 2023VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Modelscited by 686
- 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
- 2024OLMoE: Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 291
- 2020Query-Key Normalization for Transformerscited by 266
- 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 200
- 2025MiniCPM-V 4.5: Cooking Efficient MLLMs via Architecture, Data, and Training Recipecited by 174
- 2023Stabilizing Transformer Training by Preventing Attention Entropy Collapsecited by 154
- 2024Task Singular Vectors: Reducing Task Interference in Model Mergingcited by 143
- 2026Molmo2: Open Weights and Data for Vision-Language Models with Video Understanding and Groundingcited by 132
- 2025Why do LLMs attend to the first token?cited by 122
- 2024Wings: Learning Multimodal LLMs without Text-only Forgettingcited by 23
- 2025Towards Understanding Fine-Tuning Mechanisms of LLMs via Circuit Analysiscited by 20
- 2025Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddingscited by 16
- 2025STAR: Spectral Truncation and Rescale for Model Mergingcited by 11
- 2024MLAN: Language-Based Instruction Tuning Preserves and Transfers Knowledge in Multimodal Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026Decentralized Instruction Tuning: Conflict-Aware Splitting and Weight Mergingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Rethinking Fine-Tuning: Unlocking Hidden Capabilities in Vision-Language Models
- 2026LASER: A Corrective Lens for LVLMs via Visual Attention Preservation and Sink Suppression
- 2025Demystifying the Visual Quality Paradox in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2026Revisiting Parameter Redundancy in Vision-Language-Action Models: Insights from VLM-to-VLA Adaptation
- 2026Not All Layers Need Tuning: Diagnosing and Directing Adaptation in Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Towards Fine-Grained Robustness: Attention-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
- 2026Predictive Regularization Against Visual Representation Degradation in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2026Seeing Isn't Believing: Uncovering Blind Spots in Evaluator Vision-Language Models