Decentralized Instruction Tuning: Conflict-Aware Splitting and Weight Merging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Instruction tuning aligns large language models, including multimodal ones, with diverse user intents, but scaling to heterogeneous mixtures is hindered by gradient interference and bandwidth-heavy synchronization. We ask whether these two bottlenecks can be addressed jointly by training parts of the mixture independently and reconciling them once in parameter space. We develop a local quadratic theory inside a shared flat basin that yields three results: weight merging produces a curvature-weighted variance reduction; PCA-aligned conflict splitting maximizes this gain along high-curvature directions; and merging additionally acts as spectral filtering with implicit norm regularization. These results directly motivate MERIT, a decentralized merge-ready instruction-tuning pipeline that estimates dataset-level gradient conflicts, partitions the mixture along the top PCA conflict axes, fine-tunes each partition independently with no inter-partition communication, and merges once via token-weighted averaging. On Qwen2.5-VL-3B with 136 Vision-FLAN tasks, MERIT improves the 8-benchmark average from 54.3 (joint training) to 57.0. The same recipe scales to a 7B model on a 1.6M-example, 176-source mixture -- matching or exceeding centralized joint training with minimal cost overhead -- and transfers to text-only FLAN. Our code is available at https://github.com/naver-ai/merit.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.
Builds on
63 of 81 references.
References · 63
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
38 more
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
- 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,573
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
- 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,221
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
- 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
- 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 816
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
- 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 793
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
- 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
- 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
- 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
- 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 572
- 2021Conflict-Averse Gradient Descent for Multi-task Learningcited by 441
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 404
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
- 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 328
- 2024What matters when building vision-language models?cited by 321
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
- 2025SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal modelscited by 226
- 2024mPLUG-DocOwl 1.5: Unified Structure Learning for OCR-free Document Understandingcited by 220
- 2024Task Singular Vectors: Reducing Task Interference in Model Mergingcited by 143
- 2025No Task Left Behind: Isotropic Model Merging with Common and Task-Specific Subspacescited by 90
50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.