mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Closed-Loop Evaluation of Capability Loss and Recovery in Compressed Driving Policies

arXiv 2609.00718 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Imitation-learning end-to-end planners

Abstract (arXiv)

Many automobile and mobility companies deploy learned driving policies on embedded computers with limited memory and power. Pruning, knowledge distillation, and quantization are the standard methods to reduce the size and the inference cost of these policies. However, these methods are commonly assessed by aggregate numerical scores, and such scores may not reflect the ability of the policy to drive safely when interacting with other road users. In this study, we propose a stage-wise closed-loop evaluation approach to follow a driving policy through a compression pipeline. We formulate the driving task as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) and train a belief-state policy with proximal policy optimization (PPO) in Gym-Duckietown. We then extract the actor, compress it one stage at a time, and evaluate it on five driving curricula. We show that structured pruning is the stage at which the driving capability is first lost. Meanwhile, distillation improves the pruned actor, but the improvement is limited by its rehearsal data. Integer quantization of the improved actor loses some of the curricula that require the vehicle to stop and then resume. Interestingly, the same procedure on the unpruned actor preserves all five curricula. Our study thus provides an empirical analysis aiming to answer the currently active discussions on how to accept a compressed driving policy, so as to achieve a safe and statistically reliable deployment of automated driving functions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Imitation-learning end-to-end planners, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.

Builds on

23 of 33 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
  3. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,603
  4. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
  5. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
  6. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
  7. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 583
  8. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
  9. 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 472
  10. 2015Policy Distillationcited by 440
  11. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 171
  12. 2021Recurrent Model-Free RL Can Be a Strong Baseline for Many POMDPscited by 122
11 more
  1. 2023Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A surveycited by 122
  2. 2022A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation -- A Methodological Perspectivecited by 105
  3. 2016Accelerated Evaluation of Automated Vehicles Safety in Lane Change Scenarios Based on Importance Sampling Techniquescited by 45
  4. 2023FP8 versus INT8 for efficient deep learning inferencecited by 31
  5. 2020PoPS: Policy Pruning and Shrinking for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  6. 2018Where Should We Place LiDARs on the Autonomous Vehicle? - An Optimal Design Approachcited by 12
  7. 2019Modeling Multi-Vehicle Interaction Scenarios Using Gaussian Random Fieldcited by 9
  8. 2018An Accelerated Approach to Safely and Efficiently Test Pre-Production Autonomous Vehicles on Public Streetscited by 4
  9. 2026Prune-then-Quantize or Quantize-then-Prune? Understanding the Impact of Compression Order in Joint Model Compressioncited by 3
  10. 2024Order of Compression: A Systematic and Optimal Sequence to Combinationally Compress CNNcited by 1
  11. 2025Compressing Multi-Task Model for Autonomous Driving via Pruning and Knowledge Distillationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning from Mistakes: Rollout-Retrieval Lifelong Policy Learning for Autonomous Driving
  2. 2025From Imitation to Optimization: A Comparative Study of Offline Learning for Autonomous Driving
  3. 2022Driver Dojo: A Benchmark for Generalizable Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving
  4. 2026Planning-aligned Token Compression for Long-Context Autonomous Driving
  5. 2022CW-ERM: Improving Autonomous Driving Planning with Closed-loop Weighted Empirical Risk Minimization
  6. 2025DriveDPO: Policy Learning via Safety DPO For End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  7. 2026Beyond Scalar Rewards: Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Preordered Objectives for Safe and Reliable Autonomous Driving
  8. 2026RoG-DAgger: Rollout-Guided Post-Training for End-to-End Driving