mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Using Grounded Theory for Agent Behavior Analysis at Scale

arXiv 2608.30391 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding agent behavior requires methods that scale to thousands of trajectories and surface new patterns in long, often unfamiliar tasks where pre-built classifiers fall short. We propose to bring grounded theory into agent trajectory analysis: a six-decade-old qualitative method from the social sciences, with a principled saturation criterion and an auditable trail from data to theory. We propose AutoTraceGT (Automated Trace analysis through Grounded Theory), the first multi-agent pipeline that automates grounded theory on agent trajectories. It iteratively performs open, axial, and theoretical coding until saturation, producing a behavioral taxonomy tailored to each task. Across six trajectory corpora, AutoTraceGT produces codebooks that recover 73-91 percent of the failure modes in human-annotated taxonomies and surface additional patterns that those taxonomies miss. The emergent theoretical narrative aligns with prior expert accounts. Used as a deductive feature space, the codebook outperforms zero-shot and few-shot LLM baselines on downstream failure prediction. These results suggest Grounded Theory offers a scalable analytic tool for ML researchers and agent developers studying what agents actually do.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

25 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Agent-as-Peer-Debriefer: A Multi-Agent Framework with Perspective-Based Refinement for Qualitative Analysis23 May
  2. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun

Other references · 23

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  2. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  3. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  4. 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,210
  5. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,197
  6. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
  7. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
  8. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  9. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
  10. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 267
  11. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failurescited by 118
  12. 2019FLAML: A Fast and Lightweight AutoML Librarycited by 104
11 more
  1. 2023Supporting Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models: Combining Codebook with GPT-3 for Deductive Codingcited by 82
  2. 2023CollabCoder: A Lower-barrier, Rigorous Workflow for Inductive Collaborative Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Modelscited by 34
  3. 2025Go-Browse: Training Web Agents with Structured Explorationcited by 32
  4. 2026Agentic Rubrics as Contextual Verifiers for SWE Agentscited by 22
  5. 2025Butterfly Effects in Toolchains: A Comprehensive Analysis of Failed Parameter Filling in LLM Tool-Agent Systemscited by 17
  6. 2025HICode: Hierarchical Inductive Coding with LLMscited by 12
  7. 2025Auto-TA: Towards Scalable Automated Thematic Analysis (TA) via Multi-Agent Large Language Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  8. 2026How to Interpret Agent Behaviorcited by 8
  9. 2025LOGOS: LLM-driven End-to-End Grounded Theory Development and Schema Induction for Qualitative Researchcited by 6
  10. 2024AcademiaOS: Automating Grounded Theory Development in Qualitative Research with Large Language Modelscited by 1
  11. 2026Human-LLM Collaborative Feature Engineering for Tabular Datacited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agent trajectories as programs: fingerprinting and programming coding-agent behavior
  2. 2026Graphectory Viewer: A Tool for Process-Centric Analysis of Agentic Software Trajectories
  3. 2026ATLAS: Discovering Agent Strategies through LLM-Guided Abstraction and Automata Learning
  4. 2026Do Agents Know When They Succeed? Calibrating Agent Confidence from Internal Representations
  5. 2026Long-Horizon Agent Trajectory Attribution: A Unified Benchmark and Fine-Grained Annotation Framework
  6. 2026The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution
  7. 2026Signals: Trajectory Sampling and Triage for Agentic Interactions
  8. 2026Grounded Skill Synthesis from Code at Scale for Agentic Intelligence