mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Auditing MCQA Benchmarks through Probability Landscapes

arXiv 2608.30372 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models rapidly advance, performance on standard multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) benchmarks is reaching saturation. While the community has responded by developing increasingly difficult datasets, validating question quality and filtering flawed items remains a labor-intensive process. To provide a scalable diagnostic approach, we propose a two-component probabilistic framework for auditing MCQA benchmarks using model output distributions. First, for benchmark-level analysis, we characterize the probability landscape using the top prediction probability (Ptop1) and normalized residual entropy (Hnorm), summarized globally by Mean Pairwise Distance (MPD). Second, for item-level diagnostics, we introduce noise injection to reduce meaningful distractor competition, enabling us to flag candidate items for targeted human review and categorize residual failure patterns. Across four MCQA benchmarks, our landscape analysis reveals benchmark-level differences in model confidence and residual option competition. Concurrently, our noise-injection method flags potentially actionable item-level issues, showing alignment with expert error annotations from MMLU-Redux. These results suggest that our probability-based framework provides a lightweight audit lens for comparing macro-level benchmark structure and prioritizing individual items for targeted human review.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

20 of 30 references.

References · 20

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  6. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  7. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  8. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  9. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
  10. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
  11. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 486
  12. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 295
8 more
  1. 2024Generalization v.s. Memorization: Tracing Language Models' Capabilities Back to Pretraining Datacited by 85
  2. 2024Artifacts or Abduction: How Do LLMs Answer Multiple-Choice Questions Without the Question?cited by 71
  3. 2026When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturationcited by 33
  4. 2020A BERT-based Distractor Generation Scheme with Multi-tasking and Negative Answer Training Strategiescited by 22
  5. 2024The Vulnerability of Language Model Benchmarks: Do They Accurately Reflect True LLM Performance?cited by 22
  6. 2020Better Distractions: Transformer-based Distractor Generation and Multiple Choice Question Filteringcited by 17
  7. 2024Rethinking Generative Large Language Model Evaluation for Semantic Comprehensioncited by 13
  8. 2021BERT-based distractor generation for Swedish reading comprehension questions using a small-scale datasetcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.