mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fairness in multi-class multi-group classification problems via contextial coherent risk measures

arXiv 2608.30223 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a new design of fair classifiers for multi-class classification problems in the presence of vector-valued sensitive attributes. In that scenario each sensitive attribute has multiple values and forms several groups relevant to the fairness consideration. Naturally those groups are overlapping and one should also analyze the interaction of factors. Additionally, the decision makers aided by the classification should not violate individual rights at the expense of satisfying fairness metrics at the group level. We propose an approach using the theory and methods of coherent measures of risk aiming at resolving the fairness challenges. Further, we propose a specialized numerical method for solving the resulting optimization problem. The method scales well with the increase of the number of observations. Additionally, we note that the obtained classifier is robust with respect to corrupted data or to situation when data is scarce. We demonstrate the advantages of the proposed framework in comparison to the support-vector machine framework and other methods handling fairness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  2. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  3. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
  4. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  5. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  6. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  7. 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
  8. 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
  9. 2020Fair Regression with Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 100
  10. 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
  11. 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
  12. 2019Fairness risk measurescited by 85
11 more
  1. 2016A Confidence-Based Approach for Balancing Fairness and Accuracycited by 73
  2. 2018Fairness Through Computationally-Bounded Awarenesscited by 55
  3. 2020A Distributionally Robust Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 43
  4. 2021Fair Classification with Adversarial Perturbationscited by 23
  5. 2023Statistical Inference for Fairness Auditingcited by 20
  6. 2023Fairness in Multi-Task Learning via Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 14
  7. 2021Wasserstein Robust Classification with Fairness Constraintscited by 10
  8. 2022Metrizing Fairnesscited by 6
  9. 2024On the (In)Compatibility between Group Fairness and Individual Fairnesscited by 6
  10. 2023On Risk Evaluation and Control of Distributed Multi-Agent Systemscited by 2
  11. 2025Risk-averse Fair Multi-class Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.