DICS: Exploring Data Intrinsic Consistency for Visual Instruction Selection
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual instruction tuning is crucial for advancing the vision-language alignment and instruction-following capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs). However, identifying optimal subsets under a fixed ratio constraint from rapidly expanding datasets remains a significant bottleneck. While existing methods largely depend on distribution diversity or heuristic filtering, they often overlook the internal coherence within individual samples. To bridge this gap, we propose Data Intrinsic Consistency (DIC), a self-scoring metric designed to quantify the sample-level inter-component consistency. DIC consists of two modules: Visual Information Consistency (VIC), evaluating the alignment between visual content and instructions, and Response Information Consistency (RIC), assessing response coherence relative to the instruction. Building upon DIC, we introduce Data Intrinsic Consistency Selection (DICS), an adaptive data selection method that optimizes the trade-off between high intra-sample consistency and global distributional diversity under varying data budgets. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DICS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across diverse dataset scales and model architectures, surpassing full-dataset fine-tuning while using only 25% of the LLaVA-1.5-665K data. We further curate DICS-6M, a 6M-sample multi-modal instruction corpus that enables the largest-scale visual instruction selection study to date; remarkably, DICS reaches 94.52% of the official InternVL3-8B-Instruct performance using less than 25% of its reported training data. Code can be seen at https://github.com/cqu-student/DICS
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.
Builds on
29 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 10
Same direction, newest first
- 2025PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection17 Feb
- 2024ICONS: Influence Consensus for Vision-Language Data Selection31 Dec
- 2024Mastering Collaborative Multi-modal Data Selection: A Focus on Informativeness, Uniqueness, and Representativeness9 Dec
- 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling6 Dec
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution18 Sep
- 2024Vision-Flan: Scaling Human-Labeled Tasks in Visual Instruction Tuning18 Feb
- 2023ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captions21 Nov
- 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities4 Aug
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models23 Jun
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning11 May
Other references · 19
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,317
- 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 858
- 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 804
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
- 2021InfographicVQAcited by 437
7 more
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
- 2023Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpacacited by 305
- 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
- 2023Reflection-Tuning: Data Recycling Improves LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 26
- 2025Middo: Model-Informed Dynamic Data Optimization for Enhanced LLM Fine-Tuning via Closed-Loop Learningcited by 7
- 2025Taming Modality Entanglement in Continual Audio-Visual Segmentationcited by 3
- 2026Focusing Where Vision Matters: Selective Training for Large Vision Language Models via Visual Information Gaincited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Less is More: High-value Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning
- 2026Evian: Towards Explainable Visual Instruction-tuning Data Auditing
- 2024Concept-skill Transferability-based Data Selection for Large Vision-Language Models
- 2025Uncovering Intrinsic Capabilities: A Paradigm for Data Curation in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Once-For-All: A Train-Once and Select-Anytime Framework for Multimodal Instruction Tuning
- 2025Better Reasoning with Less Data: Enhancing VLMs Through Unified Modality Scoring
- 2024MLAN: Language-Based Instruction Tuning Preserves and Transfers Knowledge in Multimodal Language Models
- 2026VisNec: Measuring and Leveraging Visual Necessity for Multimodal Instruction Tuning