mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reactivating Test-Time Scaling for Plane Geometry Problem Solving

arXiv 2608.30156 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Plane geometry problem (PGP) solving has become a critical benchmark for multimodal reasoning because it requires accurate visual perception and precise multi-step symbolic deduction. Although test-time scaling (TTS) has demonstrated remarkable success in general mathematical reasoning, it fails to scale effectively under the symbolic-program paradigm for plane geometry. We identify two key obstacles: limited reasoning diversity induced by rigid symbolic programs and insufficient explicit visual grounding before symbolic deduction. To address these issues, we propose Multi-Trace Synthesis (MTS), which converts each symbolic program into heterogeneous reasoning traces, including executable Python scripts and CoT-augmented variants. We further propose Perception-Augmented (PA) training, which parses diagrams into structured semantic clauses before deduction, and Consensus-Guided Multi-Trace Ensemble (CG-MTE) for efficient self-adaptive inference. Experiments on three geometry benchmarks show that our method consistently improves PGP-solving across model scales and achieves strong performance against both general-purpose MLLMs and specialized geometry solvers. Under test-time scaling, CG-MTE achieves comparable accuracy to high-budget self-consistency while reducing sampling cost by up to 8x. Code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/Jason8Kang/ReTTS-PGPS.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

9 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Milestones over Outcome: Unlocking Geometric Reasoning with Sub-Goal Verifiable Reward8 Jan
  2. 2025GeoFM: Enhancing Geometric Reasoning of MLLMs via Synthetic Data Generation through Formal Language31 Oct
  3. 2025GeoThought: A Dataset for Enhancing Mathematical Geometry Reasoning in Vision-Language Models23 Oct
  4. 2025Bridging Formal Language with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Geometry Problem Solving12 Aug
  5. 2024Fuse, Reason and Verify: Geometry Problem Solving with Parsed Clauses from Diagram10 Jul

Other references · 4

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  3. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  4. 2023FormalGeo: An Extensible Formalized Framework for Olympiad Geometric Problem Solvingcited by 26

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Plane Geometry Problem Solving with Multi-modal Reasoning: A Survey
  2. 2026Concise Geometric Description as a Bridge: Unleashing the Potential of LLM for Plane Geometry Problem Solving
  3. 2026From Symbolic Perception to Logical Deduction: A Framework for Guiding Language Models in Geometric Reasoning
  4. 2025Geoint-R1: Formalizing Multimodal Geometric Reasoning with Dynamic Auxiliary Constructions
  5. 2026Beyond Generation and Accuracy: Diagnosing and Enhancing Visual Chain-of-Thought for Geometry Problem Solving
  6. 2025GeoBench: Rethinking Multimodal Geometric Problem-Solving via Hierarchical Evaluation
  7. 2025DynaSolidGeo: A Dynamic Benchmark for Genuine Spatial Mathematical Reasoning of VLMs in Solid Geometry
  8. 2026MetaReason: Precise Interleaved Multimodal Reasoning via Editing Meta Information for Solving Geometry Problems