mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Input-Adaptive Gating of a Dehazing Front-End for On-Device Perception in Smoke-Obscured Environments

arXiv 2608.30034 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Two-stage vision pipelines often place an enhancement network before a task network, on the assumption that a cleaner input produces a better output. We evaluate this in a firefighter assistance pipeline, where a dehazer precedes an edge detector that renders smoke-filled rooms as structural outlines. Both were designed for a Raspberry Pi 4, at 355K and 23K parameters, and quantized to UINT8 via TensorFlow Lite. The float dehazer reaches 18.60 dB peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) on held-out real smoke against 13.60 dB unprocessed and 17.08 dB for an AOD-Net trained on the same data, and the edge detector reaches an F-measure at optimal dataset scale (ODS) of 0.738, outperforming an optimized Canny's result of 0.692. Dehazing improves edge extraction under dense smoke but degrades it on clear and lightly hazed frames, where the dehazer discards more detail than the haze obscures. We therefore run the dehazer only when a dark channel haze estimate exceeds a threshold, a 10.1 ms test that lets the pipeline save 469.6 ms on the dehazing stage. Averaged over four haze levels, gating is more accurate than either fixed decision, at 0.675 mean ODS against 0.664 for always dehazing and 0.630 for never dehazing. It reduces the mean per-frame time on the Raspberry Pi from 569 ms to 321 ms, and on clear frames increases the frame rate fivefold, from 1.8 to 9 frames per second.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2026.

Builds on

10 of 20 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  3. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  4. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
  5. 2017Benchmarking Single Image Dehazing and Beyondcited by 447
  6. 2016DehazeNet: An End-to-End System for Single Image Haze Removalcited by 314
  7. 2019Dense Haze: A benchmark for image dehazing with dense-haze and haze-free imagescited by 107
  8. 2019Dense Extreme Inception Network: Towards a Robust CNN Model for Edge Detectioncited by 104
  9. 2021Dense Extreme Inception Network for Edge Detectioncited by 39
  10. 2022Structure Representation Network and Uncertainty Feedback Learning for Dense Non-Uniform Fog Removalcited by 28

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SmokeBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models for Wildfire Smoke Detection
  2. 20263D Smoke Scene Reconstruction Guided by Vision Priors from Multimodal Large Language Models
  3. 2025MFGDiffusion: Mask-Guided Smoke Synthesis for Enhanced Forest Fire Detection
  4. 2025RPD-Diff: Region-Adaptive Physics-Guided Diffusion Model for Visibility Enhancement under Dense and Non-Uniform Haze
  5. 2022Semi-UFormer: Semi-supervised Uncertainty-aware Transformer for Image Dehazing
  6. 2025SurgiATM: A Physics-Guided Plug-and-Play Model for Deep Learning-Based Smoke Removal in Laparoscopic Surgery
  7. 2023High-quality Image Dehazing with Diffusion Model
  8. 2024LMHaze: Intensity-aware Image Dehazing with a Large-scale Multi-intensity Real Haze Dataset