mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unsupervised Multi-Scale Gromov-Wasserstein Hypergraph Alignment

arXiv 2608.29635 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.SIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study unsupervised hypergraph alignment, where the goal is to infer node correspondences between two hypergraphs using only structural information, without node features, labels, seed matches, or side information. Direct higher-order formulations can represent hyperedge interactions faithfully, but they can be computationally demanding and cumbersome for non-uniform hypergraphs. Graph-reduction approaches introduce a different challenge: clique expansions keep the alignment problem on the original node set but collapse all hyperedge evidence into one pairwise graph, whereas bipartite expansions preserve incidence structure but enlarge the problem from nodes to nodes plus hyperedges. We introduce FALCON (Filtration-based hypergrAph aLignment via Cross-scale Optimal traNsport), an unsupervised optimal-transport framework for hypergraph alignment. Instead of representing each hypergraph by a single collapsed clique graph, FALCON constructs a filtration-induced sequence of clique-based co-occurrence dissimilarity matrices and jointly aligns all levels through one shared multi-scale Gromov--Wasserstein (GW) objective. The shared transport plan enforces a globally consistent node correspondence across filtration levels while avoiding the auxiliary hyperedge nodes introduced by bipartite expansion. Experiments on perturbation benchmarks derived from real-world hypergraphs show that FALCON is robust to structural noise and in almost all cases outperforms strong graph- and hypergraph-alignment baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 47 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Hypergraph Convolution and Hypergraph Attentioncited by 226
  2. 2019Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Matching and Node Embeddingcited by 125
  3. 2019Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matchingcited by 102
  4. 2018Fused Gromov-Wasserstein distance for structured objects: theoretical foundations and mathematical propertiescited by 93
  5. 2018Simplicial Closure and higher-order link predictioncited by 92
  6. 2018REGAL: Representation Learning-based Graph Alignmentcited by 40
  7. 2019Clustering in graphs and hypergraphs with categorical edge labelscited by 31
  8. 2024A Survey on Hypergraph Neural Networks: An In-Depth and Step-By-Step Guidecited by 22
  9. 2022A Comparative Study of Graph Matching Algorithms in Computer Visioncited by 14
  10. 2024A Survey on Hypergraph Mining: Patterns, Tools, and Generatorscited by 14
  11. 2022More Recent Advances in (Hyper)Graph Partitioningcited by 12
  12. 2024The Z-Gromov-Wasserstein Distancecited by 12
5 more
  1. 2022Deep Hypergraph Structure Learningcited by 7
  2. 2015A Flexible Tensor Block Coordinate Ascent Scheme for Hypergraph Matchingcited by 4
  3. 2015Triangular Alignment (TAME): A Tensor-based Approach for Higher-order Network Alignmentcited by 4
  4. 2024CURSOR: Scalable Mixed-Order Hypergraph Matching with CUR Decompositioncited by 3
  5. 2025ELRUHNA: Elimination Rule-basedHypergraph Alignmentcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.