mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SemTrace: Source-Grounded Semantic Signatures for Tracing LLM Exposure to Protected Documents

arXiv 2608.29575 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are increasingly used to read documents and produce downstream text, creating a provenance problem when the document owner cannot control or inspect the model that performs the generation. We introduce SemTrace, a source-grounded semantic watermark for detecting whether a generated review was influenced by a known protected manuscript copy. Rather than biasing token probabilities or imposing surface-form patterns, SemTrace constructs a document-specific binary signature from factual propositions that are directly supported by the manuscript itself. A protected PDF invisibly carries a content contract that selects one fact from each binary pair and asks an instruction-following reviewer to express those facts in fixed review slots without changing its independent evaluation. A frozen natural language inference model then decodes the resulting semantic evidence with explicit erasures and scores the recovered bits against the codeword assigned to that copy. This design targets model-agnostic, assigned-copy exposure detection while keeping the watermark semantically tied to the source document.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2026.

Builds on

13 of 17 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption21 Oct
  2. 2025PMark: Towards Robust and Distortion-free Semantic-level Watermarking with Channel Constraints25 Sep
  3. 2025VLA-Mark: A cross modal watermark for large vision-language alignment model18 Jul
  4. 2025In-Context Watermarks for Large Language Models22 May
  5. 2024Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Models25 Jan
  6. 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Models10 Oct
  7. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
  8. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar
  9. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 4

  1. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  2. 2024Revisiting the Robustness of Watermarking to Paraphrasing Attackscited by 25
  3. 2025Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviewscited by 20
  4. 2025CoheMark: A Novel Sentence-Level Watermark for Enhanced Text Qualitycited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Tracing Provenance and Detecting Tampering with Complementary LLM Watermarks
  2. 2025Data Provenance Auditing of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models with a Text-Preserving Technique
  3. 2025The Feasibility of Topic-Based Watermarking on Academic Peer Reviews
  4. 2024Bileve: Securing Text Provenance in Large Language Models Against Spoofing with Bi-level Signature
  5. 2024Waterfall: Framework for Robust and Scalable Text Watermarking and Provenance for LLMs
  6. 2026WoE Wrote It? Watermarking Mixture-of-Experts LLMs for Black-Box Text Provenance
  7. 2024PostMark: A Robust Blackbox Watermark for Large Language Models
  8. 2026Improving the Trade-off Between Watermark Strength and Speculative Sampling Efficiency for Language Models