mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal Anti-UAV Detection via Evidential Fusion and Conflict-Discounted Belief Aggregation

arXiv 2608.29235 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anti-UAV perception systems must remain reliable when sensor streams degrade under occlusion, fast motion, or modality-specific failure. Existing multimodal anti-UAV systems fuse RGB and thermal streams deterministically, without modeling predictive uncertainty, and cannot express doubt when streams disagree. Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) produces calibrated per-class uncertainty in a single forward pass. EDTC already exploits this for thermal-only perception, yet cross-modal evidential fusion remains unaddressed. This paper extends EDTC to multimodal RGB-Thermal perception via Discounted Belief Fusion (DBF), which converts inter-modal conflict into uncertainty mass before aggregating stream opinions. Bounding boxes are resolved by selecting the lower-uncertainty modality. On the Anti-UAV benchmark, multimodal fusion consistently outperforms either single stream (test Acc 0.670 vs. 0.604 IR, 0.598 RGB) at real-time speed (at least 38 FPS). However, DBF is empirically indistinguishable from undiscounted averaging: near-zero inter-modal conflict on this presence-dominated benchmark leaves the discounting step inert. The fused uncertainty is well-calibrated (ECE 0.057) yet expectedly a weaker localization failure detector than spatial variance (AUROC 0.626 vs. 0.739). The null result is structural: the benchmark's near-universal presence and vacuous miss-encoding jointly suppress inter-modal conflict, a diagnosis that delimits where conflict-aware fusion provides measurable benefit.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.

Builds on

20 of 29 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  5. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  6. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,013
  7. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
  8. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
  9. 2019MLPerf Inference Benchmarkcited by 199
  10. 2019SiamCAR: Siamese Fully Convolutional Classification and Regression for Visual Trackingcited by 148
  11. 2018Bounding Box Regression with Uncertainty for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 143
  12. 2018Uncertainty Estimates and Multi-Hypotheses Networks for Optical Flowcited by 135
8 more
  1. 2021FEANet: Feature-Enhanced Attention Network for RGB-Thermal Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 45
  2. 2023Evidential Detection and Tracking Collaboration: New Problem, Benchmark and Algorithm for Robust Anti-UAV Systemcited by 14
  3. 2025Securing the Skies: A Comprehensive Survey on Anti-UAV Methods, Benchmarking, and Future Directionscited by 11
  4. 2024Multimodal Learning with Uncertainty Quantification based on Discounted Belief Fusioncited by 5
  5. 2025Cross-modal Offset-guided Dynamic Alignment and Fusion for Weakly Aligned UAV Object Detectioncited by 4
  6. 2024MARINE: A Computer Vision Model for Detecting Rare Predator-Prey Interactions in Animal Videoscited by 3
  7. 2025TRIDENT: Tri-modal Real-time Intrusion Detection Engine for New Targetscited by 3
  8. 2018Multi-Source Fusion Operations in Subjective Logiccited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.