mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Unifying Perspective on Language Model Representations: From Filler-Role Structure to Mechanistic Interpretability

arXiv 2608.29034 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Knowledge and representations inside LLMs

Abstract (arXiv)

A wide range of methods have been proposed for interpreting language models, delivering important insights into their inner workings. However, different methods and their resulting insights stand in relative isolation: what could the underlying structure of language models be, such that they give rise to all our interpretations? In this work, we propose using Tensor Product Representations (TPRs) as a unifying hypothesis. TPRs give a concrete proposal for how compositional structure could be represented in vector space --- as filler-role bindings. We show, both mathematically and empirically, that TPRs can unify several prior interpretability methods: additive analogies, linear probing, sparse autoencoders, and activation patching. Mathematically, we show that these methods can all be derived from TPRs. Empirically, we apply the derivations to a range of different models --- from small toy models to LLMs --- to construct instances of each of the above interpretability methods; these constructed variants perform comparably to their standard variants. We view this work as a step toward what interpretability will ideally provide: a unified account of the nature of neural networks, corroborated not just by individual observations but also by an explanation of the connections between them.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge and representations inside LLMs, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 46 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.

Builds on

46 of 70 references.

References · 46

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  3. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  4. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  5. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  6. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  7. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
  8. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  9. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  10. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  11. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
  12. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
34 more
  1. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  2. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
  3. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  4. 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 712
  5. 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
  6. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  7. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
  8. 2023In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectorscited by 312
  9. 2023Function Vectors in Large Language Modelscited by 308
  10. 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 255
  11. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
  12. 2024How to use and interpret activation patchingcited by 214
  13. 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
  14. 2023Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representationscited by 209
  15. 2023Localizing Model Behavior with Path Patchingcited by 195
  16. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
  17. 2024AtP*: An efficient and scalable method for localizing LLM behaviour to componentscited by 111
  18. 2021A Survey on Hyperdimensional Computing aka Vector Symbolic Architectures, Part I: Models and Data Transformationscited by 99
  19. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Featurescited by 93
  20. 2024What needs to go right for an induction head? A mechanistic study of in-context learning circuits and their formationcited by 89
  21. 2019Do Attention Heads in BERT Track Syntactic Dependencies?cited by 88
  22. 2024Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Controlcited by 86
  23. 2024Measuring Progress in Dictionary Learning for Language Model Interpretability with Board Game Modelscited by 51
  24. 2024Recurrent Neural Networks Learn to Store and Generate Sequences using Non-Linear Representationscited by 47
  25. 2024NNsight and NDIF: Democratizing Access to Open-Weight Foundation Model Internalscited by 45
  26. 2024Towards Reliable Evaluation of Behavior Steering Interventions in LLMscited by 36
  27. 2021Vector Symbolic Architectures as a Computing Framework for Emerging Hardwarecited by 35
  28. 2019Discovering the Compositional Structure of Vector Representations with Role Learning Networkscited by 34
  29. 2016Issues in evaluating semantic spaces using word analogiescited by 27
  30. 2018RNNs Implicitly Implement Tensor Product Representationscited by 26
  31. 2015Representing Objects, Relations, and Sequencescited by 24
  32. 2024A Implies B: Circuit Analysis in LLMs for Propositional Logical Reasoningcited by 15
  33. 2025LLM-Microscope: Uncovering the Hidden Role of Punctuation in Context Memory of Transformerscited by 12
  34. 2025Measuring Sparse Autoencoder Feature Sensitivitycited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Tensor Product Representation Probes Reveal Shared Structure Across Linear Directions
  2. 2026Fine-Grained Analysis of Shared Syntactic Mechanisms in Language Models
  3. 2025Linguistic Interpretability of Transformer-based Language Models: a systematic review
  4. 2025Interpreting Language Models Through Concept Descriptions: A Survey
  5. 2025TRACE: Training and Inference-Time Interpretability Analysis for Language Models
  6. 2026LLMs Explain't: A Post-Mortem on Semantic Interpretability in Transformer Models
  7. 2024A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Models
  8. 2024Interpretability of Language Models via Task Spaces