Fine-Grained Analysis of Shared Syntactic Mechanisms in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While language models demonstrate sophisticated syntactic capabilities, the extent to which their internal mechanisms align with cross-constructional principles studied in linguistics remains poorly understood. This study investigates whether models employ shared neural mechanisms across different syntactic constructions by applying causal interpretability methods at a granular level. Focusing on filler-gap dependencies and negative polarity item (NPI) licensing, we utilize activation patching to identify the functional roles of specific attention heads and MLP blocks. Our results reveal a highly localized and shared mechanism for filler-gap dependencies located in the early to middle layers, whereas NPI processing exhibits no such unified mechanism. Furthermore, we find that these mechanisms identified by activation patching generalize to out-of-distribution, while distributed alignment search, a supervised interpretability method, is susceptible to overfitting on narrow linguistic distributions. Finally, we validate our findings by demonstrating that the manipulation of the identified components improves model performance on acceptability judgment benchmarks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.
Builds on
18 of 32 references.
References · 18
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
- 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 269
- 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 163
- 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 127
- 2018What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies?cited by 86
- 2019Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIscited by 58
- 2022Probing for the Usage of Grammatical Numbercited by 57
- 2024pyvene: A Library for Understanding and Improving PyTorch Models via Interventionscited by 53
- 2025How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Modelscited by 50
6 more
- 2024CausalGym: Benchmarking causal interpretability methods on linguistic taskscited by 45
- 2021Language Models Use Monotonicity to Assess NPI Licensingcited by 30
- 2025Causal Interventions Reveal Shared Structure Across English Filler-Gap Constructionscited by 21
- 2024A Reply to Makelov et al. (2023)'s "Interpretability Illusion" Argumentscited by 15
- 2024Lost in Inference: Rediscovering the Role of Natural Language Inference for Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Different types of syntactic agreement recruit the same units within large language modelscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.