From Location Phrases to Geographic Entities: Task-Adapted Retrieval for People Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
People search must map free-form location phrases to geographic entities used as structured retrieval filters. Lexical standardizers handle canonical names well but are brittle to aliases, misspellings, metropolitan expressions, and same-name ambiguity. We formulate this task as graded, set-valued entity retrieval over a fixed ontology. We identify three coupled design requirements: distinguishing identity-preserving variation from knowledge-dependent aliases, controlling false negatives among valid same-name entities, and separating stable transformations from mutable entity knowledge. We realize them in a prompt-asymmetric bi-encoder with calibrated alias support, bounded ambiguity-aware negatives, and editable entity documents that support localized updates without retraining. Across a fixed production-derived development benchmark and a public GeoNames transfer task, task adaptation improves substantially over frozen encoders and standard token baselines. Controlled development ablations show that specialized supervision contributes beyond standard task fine-tuning and encoder scaling. On GeoNames, the adapted model improves known-target Recall@1 throughout zero-to-moderate character overlap, while character n-grams retain a small aggregate Target Recall@5 advantage. In a blinded human comparison on a stratified production challenge set, our model raises relevant P@1 from 28.0% to 46.0% (p=0.012). Fixed-query endpoint estimates improve on non-canonical queries and remain close to control on frequent queries; a randomized live experiment detects no engagement regression. These results support task-adapted geographic entity retrieval as a practical replacement for the incumbent taxonomy-based standardizer, with the largest relevance gains on non-canonical queries.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.
Builds on
20 of 35 references.
References · 20
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
- 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 413
- 2020Self-Alignment Pretraining for Biomedical Entity Representationscited by 237
- 2022Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examplescited by 235
- 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 131
- 2019Zero-Shot Entity Linking by Reading Entity Descriptionscited by 124
- 2023Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgmentcited by 85
- 2020Biomedical Entity Representations with Synonym Marginalizationcited by 61
- 2024UMBRELA: UMbrela is the (Open-Source Reproduction of the) Bing RELevance Assessorcited by 42
8 more
- 2022SpaBERT: A Pretrained Language Model from Geographic Data for Geo-Entity Representationcited by 23
- 2018Talent Search and Recommendation Systems at LinkedIn: Practical Challenges and Lessons Learnedcited by 11
- 2024LLM-Assisted Relevance Assessments: When Should We Ask LLMs for Help?cited by 11
- 2023Improving Toponym Resolution with Better Candidate Generation, Transformer-based Reranking, and Two-Stage Resolutioncited by 7
- 2025Evaluating Design Decisions for Dual Encoder-based Entity Disambiguationcited by 5
- 2024Where on Earth Do Users Say They Are?: Geo-Entity Linking for Noisy Multilingual User Inputcited by 4
- 2024DynamicER: Resolving Emerging Mentions to Dynamic Entities for RAGcited by 4
- 2026Semantic Search At LinkedIncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.