mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Where on Earth Do Users Say They Are?: Geo-Entity Linking for Noisy Multilingual User Input

arXiv 2404.18784 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Geo-entity linking is the task of linking a location mention to the real-world geographic location. In this paper we explore the challenging task of geo-entity linking for noisy, multilingual social media data. There are few open-source multilingual geo-entity linking tools available and existing ones are often rule-based, which break easily in social media settings, or LLM-based, which are too expensive for large-scale datasets. We present a method which represents real-world locations as averaged embeddings from labeled user-input location names and allows for selective prediction via an interpretable confidence score. We show that our approach improves geo-entity linking on a global and multilingual social media dataset, and discuss progress and problems with evaluating at different geographic granularities.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2024.

Builds on

17 of 49 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2023GeoLM: Empowering Language Models for Geospatially Grounded Language Understandingcited by 37
  3. 2022SpaBERT: A Pretrained Language Model from Geographic Data for Geo-Entity Representationcited by 23
  4. 2022Location reference recognition from texts: A survey and comparisoncited by 17
  5. 2019Location reference identification from tweets during emergencies: A deep learning approachcited by 14
  6. 2019A Hierarchical Location Prediction Neural Network for Twitter User Geolocationcited by 11
  7. 2021MOLEMAN: Mention-Only Linking of Entities with a Mention Annotation Networkcited by 10
  8. 2020Enhancing spatial and textual analysis with EUPEG: an extensible and unified platform for evaluating geoparserscited by 9
  9. 2015Confounds and Consequences in Geotagged Twitter Datacited by 8
  10. 2017Continuous Representation of Location for Geolocation and Lexical Dialectology using Mixture Density Networkscited by 8
  11. 2018A Coherent Unsupervised Model for Toponym Resolutioncited by 8
  12. 2023Improving Toponym Resolution with Better Candidate Generation, Transformer-based Reranking, and Two-Stage Resolutioncited by 7
5 more
  1. 2015Exploiting Text and Network Context for Geolocation of Social Media Userscited by 6
  2. 2021Changes in Twitter geolocations: Insights and suggestions for future usagecited by 6
  3. 2019A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Geotagging Behavior on Twittercited by 5
  4. 2020A Deep Learning Approach to Geographical Candidate Selection through Toponym Matchingcited by 3
  5. 2024Privacy risk in GeoData: A surveycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.