mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SHAPE of Chain-of-Thought in Math Reasoning

arXiv 2608.28600 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yet final-answer accuracy reveals little about the strategies they use. We introduce textttSHAPE (Structured Heuristic Analysis for Problem-solving Evolution), a framework grounded in mathematics-education research that characterizes local mathematical actions in reasoning trajectories using a problem-independent heuristic taxonomy. Using textttSHAPE, we examine two previously hypothesized phenomena in LLM reasoning. First, we revisit the hypothesis that LLMs reuse learned solution techniques under problem perturbations. Across six models on MATH-Perturb, perturbations requiring a different solution approach yield lower accuracy but greater heuristic shifts than those preserving it. Second, we characterize mode-seeking in RLVR through mathematical heuristic profiles. Across four base--RL pairs, successful RL solutions overlap substantially with base-model profiles. We further introduce Heuristic-Augmented Plan-GRPO (HA-Plan-GRPO), which guides RLVR planning through heuristic selection and applicability reasoning. Across three models and five evaluation sets, it improves mean Avg@16 by up to 7.0% absolute and mean Pass@16 by up to 2.4% absolute over planning-only RLVR. Our code is available at hrefhttps://github.com/holi-lab/shape-of-CoThttps://github.com/holi-lab/shape-of-CoT.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 22 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.

Builds on

22 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Schoenfeld's Anatomy of Mathematical Reasoning by Language Models23 Dec
  2. 2025MATH-Perturb: Benchmarking LLMs' Math Reasoning Abilities against Hard Perturbations10 Feb
  3. 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models10 Oct
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models5 Feb

Other references · 18

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  4. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  5. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
  6. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
  7. 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
  8. 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Modelscited by 219
  9. 2025When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMscited by 183
  10. 2025Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithfulcited by 170
  11. 2025Thought Anchors: Which LLM Reasoning Steps Matter?cited by 129
  12. 2025Olmo 3cited by 129
6 more
  1. 2025Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMscited by 117
  2. 2025The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origincited by 97
  3. 2025Nemotron-Cascade: Scaling Cascaded Reinforcement Learning for General-Purpose Reasoning Modelscited by 48
  4. 2024On the Hardness of Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 43
  5. 2025RL Squeezes, SFT Expands: A Comparative Study of Reasoning LLMscited by 34
  6. 2025Do LLMs Really Need 10+ Thoughts for "Find the Time 1000 Days Later"? Towards Structural Understanding of LLM Overthinkingcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024From Next-Token to Mathematics: The Learning Dynamics of Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models
  2. 2025A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning
  3. 2026The Potential of CoT for Reasoning: A Closer Look at Trace Dynamics
  4. 2026Math Takes Two: A test for emergent mathematical reasoning in communication
  5. 2025KisMATH: Do LLMs Have Knowledge of Implicit Structures in Mathematical Reasoning?
  6. 2024Beyond Lines and Circles: Unveiling the Geometric Reasoning Gap in Large Language Models
  7. 2025Atomic Thinking of LLMs: Decoupling and Exploring Mathematical Reasoning Abilities
  8. 2024CoMAT: Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought Improves Mathematical Reasoning