SEPO: Evidence-Grounded Prompt Optimization via Structural Editing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing API-only prompt optimisers are often described as interpretable, but in practice, this usually means only post-hoc inspectability: each iteration still rewrites the prompt as one opaque string, leaving a trace of full-prompt diffs rather than localisable, machine-readable edits. This paper introduces SEPO (Structural, Evidence-grounded Prompt Optimization), a multi-trajectory prompt optimiser centred on edit-effect lineage feedback. Rather than treating each iteration as an isolated whole-prompt rewrite, SEPO locally edits stable, typed units in a two-layer prompt schema, links the target and realised structural operations of each edit to the examples it newly fixes or breaks, and carries this edit-effect record forward to guide later architect calls on the same search branch. This makes prompt optimisation addressable, attributable, and actionable. Across a 14-task held-out suite, SEPO improves over the strongest baseline, GEPA, by 3.1 pp on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and 2.2 pp on Qwen3-8B, reaching 61.9% and 73.3% macro accuracy. SEPO also lies on both the optimisation-time and test-time Pareto frontiers, spending 2.9M optimisation tokens versus 4.1M for GEPA and producing prompts over 5x shorter.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.
Builds on
29 of 52 references.
References · 29
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 830
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 628
- 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
- 2024Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programscited by 270
17 more
- 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 226
- 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?cited by 105
- 2025A Systematic Survey of Automatic Prompt Optimization Techniquescited by 61
- 2024PRompt Optimization in Multi-Step Tasks (PROMST): Integrating Human Feedback and Heuristic-based Samplingcited by 32
- 2024Symbolic Prompt Program Search: A Structure-Aware Approach to Efficient Compile-Time Prompt Optimizationcited by 29
- 2024CriSPO: Multi-Aspect Critique-Suggestion-guided Automatic Prompt Optimization for Text Generationcited by 18
- 2024Task Facet Learning: A Structured Approach to Prompt Optimizationcited by 17
- 2024SCULPT: Systematic Tuning of Long Promptscited by 8
- 2025ZERA: Zero-init Instruction Evolving Refinement Agent -- From Zero Instructions to Structured Prompts via Principle-based Optimizationcited by 6
- 2026Modular Prompt Optimization: Optimizing Structured Prompts with Section-Local Textual Gradientscited by 5
- 2026Adaptive Prompt Structure Factorization: A Framework for Self-Discovering and Optimizing Compositional Prompt Programscited by 5
- 2025Local Prompt Optimizationcited by 4
- 2026Learning from Prompt itself: the Hierarchical Attribution Prompt Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Select Smarter, Not More: Prompt-Aware Evaluation Scheduling with Submodular Guaranteescited by 1
- 2026One Rewrite to Fix Them All? Type-Aware Repair Allocation for Text-to-Image Prompt Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Are Prompt Optimizers Blind? Cross-Modal Visual Feedback for Automatic Prompt Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Plans You Can Check: Verifier-Grounded Learning of an Open-Weight Planner for Executable Video-Editingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.