mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SCULPT: Systematic Tuning of Long Prompts

arXiv 2410.20788 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt optimization is essential for effective utilization of large language models (LLMs) across diverse tasks. While existing optimization methods are effective in optimizing short prompts, they struggle with longer, more complex ones, often risking information loss and being sensitive to small perturbations. To address these challenges, we propose SCULPT (Systematic Tuning of Long Prompts), a framework that treats prompt optimization as a hierarchical tree refinement problem. SCULPT represents prompts as tree structures, enabling targeted modifications while preserving contextual integrity. It employs a Critic-Actor framework that generates reflections and applies actions to refine the prompt. Evaluations demonstrate SCULPT's effectiveness on long prompts, its robustness to adversarial perturbations, and its ability to generate high-performing prompts even without any initial human-written prompt. Compared to existing state of the art methods, SCULPT consistently improves LLM performance by preserving essential task information while applying structured refinements. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses show that SCULPT produces more stable and interpretable prompt modifications, ensuring better generalization across tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2024.

Builds on

26 of 110 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  8. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  9. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
  10. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  11. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  12. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
14 more
  1. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  2. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  3. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  4. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  5. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  6. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 628
  7. 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
  8. 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 479
  9. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 376
  10. 2022Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task Descriptionscited by 152
  11. 2023Large Language Models as Evolutionary Optimizerscited by 122
  12. 2023Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Trainingcited by 122
  13. 2024Are Large Language Models Good Prompt Optimizers?cited by 37
  14. 2023AutoHint: Automatic Prompt Optimization with Hint Generationcited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.