mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RealSWE: A Compositional Evaluation of Coding Agents under Realistic User Requests

arXiv 2608.27831 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.SEcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Coding agents are now commonly evaluated on the SWE-bench family of benchmarks, whose tasks are built from curated GitHub issues: long, structured, and information-rich. Real user requests, however, are typically far shorter and less structured. To characterize this gap, we define a six-category information taxonomy and four dimensions of linguistic style, and apply them to real user prompts from SWE-chat and problem statements from SWE-bench Verified and Pro. We find that requests carrying only a problem statement, alone or with limited additional context, account for 88% of real prompts but just 7% of benchmark problems. Furthermore, 87% of real prompts are casually written whereas 94% of benchmark problems are formal. Guided by these observations, we introduce RealSWE, 381 multi-variant task families derived from SWE-bench Verified and Pro. Variants within each family share the same underlying task and gold patch while differing only in information composition and linguistic style. Evaluating seven contemporary LLMs with RealSWE, we find that i) realistic inputs reduce resolution rates by 6.4 pp on average and can change model rankings. Controlled analysis further shows that ii) including Desired Behavior and Motivation significantly affects performance, whereas Environment Information and Reproduction Steps merely add tokens without measurable benefit; iii) linguistic style has only small, model-dependent effects. These findings provide actionable guidance for users and agents: explicitly stating the desired behavior and motivation, which most real prompts omit, substantially improves the LLM's software engineering performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026DeepSWE: Measuring Frontier Coding Agents on Original, Long-Horizon Engineering Tasks8 Jul
  2. 2026SWE-INTERACT: Reimagining SWE Benchmarks as User-Driven Long-Horizon Coding Sessions29 Jun
  3. 2026Dialogue SWE-Bench: A Benchmark for Dialogue-Driven Coding Agents12 Jun
  4. 2026SWE-chat: Coding Agent Interactions From Real Users in the Wild22 Apr
  5. 2026REAP: Automatic Curation of Coding Agent Benchmarks from Interactive Production Usage2 Apr
  6. 2025Saving SWE-Bench: A Benchmark Mutation Approach for Realistic Agent Evaluation10 Oct
  7. 2025SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agents11 Apr
  8. 2024HumanEvalComm: Benchmarking the Communication Competence of Code Generation for LLMs and LLM Agent31 May
  9. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May

Other references · 10

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  2. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
  3. 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 203
  4. 2025Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolvingcited by 171
  5. 2025SWE-bench Goes Live!cited by 80
  6. 2025FEA-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Repository-Level Code Generation for Feature Implementationcited by 58
  7. 2024NLPerturbator: Studying the Robustness of Code LLMs to Natural Language Variationscited by 20
  8. 2026Ask or Assume? Uncertainty-Aware Clarification-Seeking in Coding Agentscited by 19
  9. 2025Persona-Augmented Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs Across Diverse Writing Stylescited by 16
  10. 2025SWE-MERA: A Dynamic Benchmark for Agenticly Evaluating Large Language Models on Software Engineering Taskscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SWE-Together: Evaluating Coding Agents in Interactive User Sessions
  2. 2026Coding-Agent Benchmarks Should Match Their Users' Task Flows
  3. 2026Coding Agents are Strong Prompt Optimizers
  4. 2026SWE-Journey: Towards More Realistic Evaluation of Coding Assistants through Long-Horizon, Multi-Turn Interaction
  5. 2026Compact Documentation for Coding Agents: A Benchmark, an Optimizer, and Why It Does Not Transfer
  6. 2026ANCHOR: Assessing Naturalistic Constraint Hierarchies and Ordering in Repository-Grounded Agentic Coding
  7. 2025TOM-SWE: User Mental Modeling For Software Engineering Agents
  8. 2025SWE-Compass: Towards Unified Evaluation of Agentic Coding Abilities for Large Language Models