mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probing Perceptual Priors of MLLMs via Gibbs Sampling with Interpretable Generative Controls

arXiv 2608.27727 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A model's behavior on a task is jointly determined by the input it receives and the prior it brings in, i.e. the distribution over stimuli it implicitly expects. Interpretability research has traditionally studied models by holding inputs fixed and examining model responses either mechanistically, probing how internal structure represents inputs, or behaviorally, measuring how variation in inputs leads to variation in outputs. Neither reconstructs the prior distribution itself, since internal structure shows what a model can represent, not what it expects, and any fixed stimulus set leaves most of the possible input space unseen. In particular, such an input space in real-world settings, such as images seen by VLMs, is extremely high-dimensional and diverse. These priors thus remain a poorly understood component of models that nonetheless influence real-world behavior. We propose a method to sample from models' perceptual prior distributions directly, by steering a generative model to produce stimuli along controllable axes and running Gibbs sampling over that space with the model under study as the judge. We apply this to a variety of categories and target variables (such as trustworthiness in faces and cheapness in art images) and recover both canonical biases and surprising novel priors invisible to direct prompting, warranting further investigation of their downstream effects.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.

Builds on

23 of 48 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  3. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  4. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  5. 2025FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Spacecited by 1,006
  6. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
  7. 2020GANSpace: Discovering Interpretable GAN Controlscited by 614
  8. 2022Diffusion Models already have a Semantic Latent Spacecited by 328
  9. 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 263
  10. 2023Concept Sliders: LoRA Adaptors for Precise Control in Diffusion Modelscited by 153
  11. 2024Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluatorscited by 153
  12. 2023Generative agent-based modeling with actions grounded in physical, social, or digital space using Concordiacited by 126
11 more
  1. 2023Discovering Interpretable Directions in the Semantic Latent Space of Diffusion Modelscited by 60
  2. 2023Large language models predict human sensory judgments across six modalitiescited by 48
  3. 2020Gibbs Sampling with Peoplecited by 28
  4. 2025SliderSpace: Decomposing the Visual Capabilities of Diffusion Modelscited by 26
  5. 2024Eliciting the Priors of Large Language Models using Iterated In-Context Learningcited by 19
  6. 2025Discovering and Steering Interpretable Concepts in Large Generative Music Modelscited by 13
  7. 2025A Framework for Studying AI Agent Behavior: Evidence from Consumer Choice Experimentscited by 12
  8. 2021Exploring emotional prototypes in a high dimensional TTS latent spacecited by 6
  9. 2022VoiceMe: Personalized voice generation in TTScited by 6
  10. 2025LLM Agents Are Hypersensitive to Nudgescited by 5
  11. 2026Visual Persuasion: What Influences Decisions of Vision-Language Models?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Synthesizing Images on Perceptual Boundaries of ANNs for Uncovering and Manipulating Human Perceptual Variability
  2. 2026Visuals Lie, Consistency Speaks: Disentangling Spatial Attention from Reliability in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Emergent Bayesian Behaviour and Optimal Cue Combination in LLMs
  4. 2026Embodied Interpretability: Linking Causal Understanding to Generalization in Vision-Language-Action Models
  5. 2026Where Reliability Lives in Vision-Language Models: A Mechanistic Study of Attention, Hidden States, and Causal Circuits
  6. 2025Addressing divergent representations from causal interventions on neural networks
  7. 2026Circuit Condensation: Post-Training that Concentrates a Behavior's Causal Circuit
  8. 2024Towards Unifying Interpretability and Control: Evaluation via Intervention