mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Non-IID: Learner--Client Distribution Mismatch in Federated Learning

arXiv 2608.27715 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning systems are increasingly deployed to facilitate collaborative model training across a heterogeneous client population. Existing practice mostly implicitly assumes that the aggregated client data distribution is representative of the learner's target distribution or that learning from all available clients is uniformly beneficial for the learner distribution. However, such an assumption often does not hold in reality. Traditional client selection strategies in FL literature largely overlook such misalignment, while most existing work on multi-source transfer learning either requires direct access to local data or uses one-shot model/feature aggregation. In this paper, we take the initiative to understand and mitigate the impacts of such learner-client population misalignment. In particular, we consider the practical setting where the learner keeps a small proxy dataset. We observe that client contributions vary significantly across training rounds, and traditional technology is insufficient to identify beneficial sources under multi-source transfer diversity. Then, we propose a dynamic, influence-aware client selection framework that estimates each client's potential utility to the learner's optimization objective using proxy influence signals on a learner-specific proxy set. Via using leave-one-out evaluations, we prioritize the most informative sources of knowledge while controlling the negative impacts of statistical noise and data heterogeneity. Experiments on CIFAR-10 under heterogeneous data partitions demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms static and dynamic baselines, achieving faster convergence and higher accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  4. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  5. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
  6. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  7. 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 832
  8. 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 672
  9. 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 672
  10. 2020Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Frameworkcited by 455
  11. 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 352
  12. 2020Federated learning with hierarchical clustering of local updates to improve training on non-IID datacited by 223
7 more
  1. 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 172
  2. 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
  3. 2015Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAICcited by 110
  4. 2020TiFL: A Tier-based Federated Learning Systemcited by 96
  5. 2020Toward Understanding the Influence of Individual Clients in Federated Learningcited by 16
  6. 2023H-ensemble: An Information Theoretic Approach to Reliable Few-Shot Multi-Source-Free Transfercited by 6
  7. 2025A High-Dimensional Statistical Method for Optimizing Transfer Quantities in Multi-Source Transfer Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.