mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PACE: Publisher-Adaptive Content Extraction via Agentic Automation

arXiv 2608.27466 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Web content extraction is essential for reliable LLM data pipelines, yet existing methods often struggle to jointly satisfy accuracy, scalability, and adaptability. General-purpose extractors can be applied broadly, but they are often brittle on publisher-specific layouts and richer extraction targets such as metadata, images, and tables. Direct LLM-based extraction offers greater flexibility, but incurs substantial cost and latency at scale, while manually engineered publisher-specific parsers can achieve high accuracy but require substantial human effort to build and maintain. We introduce PACE, an agentic framework for learning publisher-specific extraction configurations from representative pages and user requirements. During training, PACE uses LLMs to analyze page structure and aggregate reusable extraction patterns. At inference time, the learned configurations instantiate a fixed deterministic extractor template, enabling scalable extraction without additional LLM calls. Experiments spanning article-body, metadata, and multimodal extraction show that PACE outperforms scalable non-manual baselines while approaching the quality of manually engineered publisher-specific parsers. PACE achieves stronger extraction of article text, metadata, images, and tables, demonstrating that agentic configuration learning can automate publisher-specific extraction for LLM-ready page representations beyond article text.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.

Builds on

13 of 21 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  4. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  5. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  6. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  7. 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
  8. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
  9. 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 183
  10. 2023Retrieving Multimodal Information for Augmented Generation: A Surveycited by 84
  11. 2025A Survey of Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 37
  12. 2020Boilerplate Removal using a Neural Sequence Labeling Modelcited by 11
1 more
  1. 2024Fundus: A Simple-to-Use News Scraper Optimized for High Quality Extractionscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025WebLists: Extracting Structured Information From Complex Interactive Websites Using Executable LLM Agents
  2. 2025An Index-based Approach for Efficient and Effective Web Content Extraction
  3. 2025Agentic publications: redesigning scientific publishing in the age of thinking large language models
  4. 2024OneKE: A Dockerized Schema-Guided LLM Agent-based Knowledge Extraction System
  5. 2026ExtractBench: A Benchmark for Schema-Guided Enterprise Document Extraction
  6. 2026AgenticScholar: Agentic Data Management with Pipeline Orchestration for Scholarly Corpora
  7. 2026WCXB: A Multi-Type Web Content Extraction Benchmark
  8. 2026Behavioral Controllability of Agentic Models for Information Extraction: From Fixed Workflows to Reflective Agents