ExtractBench: A Benchmark for Schema-Guided Enterprise Document Extraction
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Enterprise workflows increasingly rely on agents for schema-guided extraction: given a document and a user-defined schema, the agent faithfully follows the schema to produce the correct output with source evidence as grounding metadata. We present ExtractBench, a benchmark for schema-guided extraction and, to our knowledge, the first to score value accuracy, record completeness at scale, grounding, and measured cost together. The evaluation system contains 4,869 pages across 370 enterprise documents, 8 business domains, and 67 document types, with clear tags differentiating their challenge scenarios. The scalable schema and ground-truth curation pipeline combines independent-system agreement for real documents, known values for synthetic lists, and human verification for forms. We report order-insensitive value F1 for value accuracy, plus two grounding metrics for source traceability: word- and page-level F1. Commercial VLMs perform well on short documents but often truncate record lists on long ones, while coding agents retain higher accuracy at much higher cost. LlamaExtract Agentic Plus ranks first on all three metrics, with accuracy comparable to coding agents at a fraction of the cost. Dataset and evaluation code are available on hrefhttps://huggingface.co/datasets/llamaindex/ExtractBenchHuggingFace and hrefhttps://github.com/run-llama/ExtractBenchGitHub.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.
Builds on
12 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025FormGym: Doing Paperwork with Agents17 Jun
Other references · 11
- 2019FUNSD: A Dataset for Form Understanding in Noisy Scanned Documentscited by 345
- 2021CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Reviewcited by 232
- 2021Kleister: Key Information Extraction Datasets Involving Long Documents with Complex Layoutscited by 82
- 2023DocILE Benchmark for Document Information Localization and Extractioncited by 58
- 2022VRDU: A Benchmark for Visually-rich Document Understandingcited by 35
- 2026ExtractBench: A Benchmark and Evaluation Methodology for Complex Structured Extractioncited by 8
- 2025Visual Template Inference for Data Extraction from Documentscited by 6
- 2025Document Haystack: A Long Context Multimodal Image/Document Understanding Vision LLM Benchmarkcited by 6
- 2026UNIKIE-BENCH: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models for Key Information Extraction in Visual Documentscited by 4
- 2026VAREX: A Benchmark for Multi-Modal Structured Extraction from Documentscited by 4
- 2026ExStrucTiny: A Benchmark for Schema-Variable Structured Information Extraction from Document Imagescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026GUIDE: Governed Unified Intelligence for Document-to-Artifact Generation in Enterprise Settings
- 2026SAGE: Governed Artifact Generation from Enterprise Guidelines
- 2026Fidelity Is Not Enough: Dispatch-Level Instrumentation for Agentic Datasheet Extraction
- 2026ParseBench: A Document Parsing Benchmark for AI Agents
- 2026Beyond Accuracy: Robustness, Cost, and Governance Trade-offs for Vision-Language Models in Templated Document Extraction
- 2026Schematize: An Agentic System for Generating and Refining Information-Extraction Schemas for Legal Research
- 2026Closing Cost-Quality Gap in Document VLMs: Difficulty-Aware Data Curation and Quality-Adjusted Deployment Economics
- 2025PARSE: LLM Driven Schema Optimization for Reliable Entity Extraction