Orthogonal Gromov-Wasserstein Discrepancy with Efficient Lower Bound
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Comparing structured data from possibly different metric-measure spaces is a fundamental task in machine learning, with applications in, e.g., graph classification. The Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) discrepancy formulates a coupling between the structured data based on optimal transportation, tackling the incomparability between different structures by aligning the intra-relational geometries. Although efficient local solvers such as conditional gradient and Sinkhorn are available, the inherent non-convexity still prevents a tractable evaluation, and the existing lower bounds are not tight enough for practical use. To address this issue, we take inspiration from the connection with the quadratic assignment problem, and propose the orthogonal Gromov-Wasserstein (OGW) discrepancy as a surrogate of GW. It admits an efficient and closed-form lower bound with O(n3) complexity, and directly extends to the fused Gromov-Wasserstein (FGW) distance, incorporating node features into the coupling. Extensive experiments on both the synthetic and real-world datasets show the tightness of our lower bounds, and both OGW and its lower bounds efficiently deliver accurate predictions and satisfactory barycenters for graph sets.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2022.
Builds on
11 of 41 references.
References · 11
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,089
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,048
- 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 714
- 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 494
- 2018Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphscited by 172
- 2019Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Matching and Node Embeddingcited by 126
- 2018Gromov-Wasserstein Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 122
- 2019Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matchingcited by 103
- 2019Sliced Gromov-Wassersteincited by 66
- 2018GraKeL: A Graph Kernel Library in Pythoncited by 54
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025A Novel Sliced Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Distancecited by 9
- 2023Optimal Transport for Kernel Gaussian Mixture Modelscited by 0
- 2026Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generationcited by 0
- 2026Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generation27 Aug 2026
- 2025A Novel Sliced Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Distance4 Aug 2025
- 2023Optimal Transport for Kernel Gaussian Mixture Models28 Oct 2023