Generative modeling of intrinsically disordered protein regions by reinforcing sparse autoencoder features
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Interpreting biomedical and science models
Abstract (arXiv)
Intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDRs) play central roles in cellular processes such as transcriptional regulation, signal transduction, and subcellular localization, yet their functional design remains challenging. Structure-based design methods do not readily apply to IDRs, and existing protein language models are trained on full-length protein sequences, thus learning a prior that is biased towards folded domains. Here, we present IDiom, an autoregressive protein language model trained on IDiom-DB, a dataset of 54 million predicted IDRs curated from the AlphaFold Database. IDiom generates diverse sequences that recapitulate the composition, patterning, motifs, and predicted disorder of natural IDRs. To control function-associated sequence patterns, we also introduce reinforcement learning with sparse autoencoder features (RL-SAE), a post-training method that rewards the generation of sequences that activate specified feature sets. Across eight IDR design tasks, RL-SAE sequences activate, on average, 90% of 30 targeted features, compared to 24% for activation steering. We demonstrate that RL-SAE improves the predicted subcellular localization and transcriptional activity of generated IDRs compared to steering and supervised fine-tuning, and enables features associated with distinct biological functions to be combined within individual sequences. Thus, IDiom and RL-SAE enable interpretable and composable IDR design through explicit control of function-associated sequence features. More broadly, RL-SAE could extend to other protein design settings where interpretable features provide useful design targets. Code is available at https://github.com/rotskoff-group/idiom.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpreting biomedical and science models, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 13 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
13 of 77 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 12
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
- 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2022Efficient Training of Language Models to Fill in the Middlecited by 255
- 2025SAEs Are Good for Steering -- If You Select the Right Featurescited by 78
- 2025La-Proteina: Atomistic Protein Generation via Partially Latent Flow Matchingcited by 30
- 2025Interpretable Reward Model via Sparse Autoencodercited by 18
- 2024Aligning Transformers with Continuous Feedback via Energy Rank Alignmentcited by 7
- 2025A Comparative Analysis of Sparse Autoencoder and Activation Difference in Language Model Steeringcited by 4
- 2026Control Reinforcement Learning: Interpretable Token-Level Steering of LLMs via Sparse Autoencoder Featurescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders for Low-N Protein Function Prediction and Design
- 2026Learning Latent Protein Languages for Autoregressive Generation
- 2026Interpreting Latent Protein Language Model Features with Geometric Annotations
- 2023PoET: A generative model of protein families as sequences-of-sequences
- 2025Towards Interpretable Protein Structure Prediction with Sparse Autoencoders
- 2024Diffusion on language model encodings for protein sequence generation
- 2025Steering Protein Language Models