Investigating the Influence of Prompt and Response Languages on LLM Content Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study examines how prompt and response language influence the behavior of large language models. Using five models, we evaluated answers to 68 non translation questions across four language conditions: English to English, English to Norwegian, Norwegian to Norwegian, and Norwegian to English. After removing refused items, the dataset contains 1348 responses. We measure length differences with Cohen d, semantic fidelity with LabSE cosine similarity, and cross lingual keyword overlap with both raw and soft Jaccard. Prompt language has a strong effect on response length. With English output, Norwegian prompts shorten responses by about thirty seven percent. With Norwegian output, English prompts shorten responses by about forty one percent. The largest cross lingual contrast shows a reduction in word count but a smaller reduction in tokens, reflecting tokenizer differences. Despite variation in length, semantic similarity remains high, and soft Jaccard reveals substantial conceptual overlap that raw Jaccard does not capture. Effect sizes vary across models, indicating heterogeneity. Prompt language is not neutral and systematically shapes output length and lexical realization, with implications for multilingual prompt design.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2026.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 621
- 2022Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasonerscited by 518
- 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 285
- 2022Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLPcited by 216
- 2020A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systemscited by 164
- 2024Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?cited by 132
- 2024CultureLLM: Incorporating Cultural Differences into Large Language Modelscited by 49
- 2023Semantic Compression With Large Language Modelscited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.