mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ToST: A Tree-of-Thought Socratic Teaching Framework for Multi-Path Guidance and Parallel Thinking

arXiv 2608.25775 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong problem-solving abilities, positioning them as promising agents for Socratic teaching to guide students through step-by-step heuristic questioning. However, existing approaches typically adopt a one-problem-one-solution paradigm, restricting the teaching guidance to a single linear reasoning path. This design limits instructional flexibility, weakens error recovery, and restricts students' ability to engage in parallel thinking to explore multiple valid solutions. To overcome these, we propose ToST, a Tree-of-Thought Socratic Teaching framework that explicitly supports multi-path guidance under a one-problem-multiple-solutions paradigm. ToST employs Parallel Sowing, a parallel-thinking-oriented questioning strategy to encourage students to approach problems from diverse perspectives, and a Multi-Path Adaptive Guidance mechanism to provide more robust and non-linear instructions across alternative solution trajectories. Concurrently, to fill the void in systematically evaluating such non-linear instructional capabilities, we advance the task of multi-path Socratic guidance by establishing MPSG-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark that includes a dataset of 31K multi-path teaching dialogues and a five-dimensional evaluation framework grounded in the SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) theory to assess parallel-thinking guidance. Experimental results demonstrate that ToST significantly enhances guidance success rates while empowering students to navigate and explore multiple solution paths more effectively under both automatic and human metrics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.

Builds on

9 of 40 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  3. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  4. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
  5. 2020CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesiscited by 479
  6. 2025LLM Agents for Education: Advances and Applicationscited by 59
  7. 2025From Problem-Solving to Teaching Problem-Solving: Aligning LLMs with Pedagogy using Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  8. 2025GoAI: Enhancing AI Students' Learning Paths and Idea Generation via Graph of AI Ideascited by 6
  9. 2025CoderAgent: Simulating Student Behavior for Personalized Programming Learning with Large Language Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023The Art of SOCRATIC QUESTIONING: Recursive Thinking with Large Language Models
  2. 2025Socratic Students: Teaching Language Models to Learn by Asking Questions
  3. 2025EduFlow: Advancing MLLMs' Problem-Solving Proficiency through Multi-Stage, Multi-Perspective Critique
  4. 2022Automatic Generation of Socratic Subquestions for Teaching Math Word Problems
  5. 2025Parallel-R1: Towards Parallel Thinking via Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Beyond Direct Answering: Aligning Educational LLMs as Socratic Guides via Heuristic Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models
  8. 2026Ladders of Thought: A Self-Evolving Curriculum of Progressively Simplified Reasoning Traces