Fast rates in Bayesian online learning with approximate posteriors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Exact Bayes prediction enjoys fast predictive regret guarantees, but exact posterior updating or representation may be too costly for online use. We study when these statistical guarantees are preserved by computational approximations. We show that the cumulative price of posterior approximation can be governed by the interaction between the contraction radius of the exact Gibbs posterior and the Wasserstein distance between the approximate and exact posteriors. Our general theorem shows that whenever exact Bayes prediction achieves a fast regret bound, any approximate posterior method that tracks the exact posterior with sufficient accuracy inherits the same fast regret, up to an additive term determined by the approximation error. Three online learning examples are developed. For linear models with strongly convex regularized losses, a projected Langevin algorithm yields an approximate posterior that achieves logarithmic regret. For an infinite-dimensional canonical exponential family sequence model over a Sobolev ellipsoid, a prior-preserving truncation method attains the minimax predictive regret rate with sublinear memory and constant update cost per observation. For random-design Gaussian process (GP) regression, a sparse variational posterior with inducing variables achieves the same predictive regret rate as the exact GP, but at substantially lower computational cost.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.
Builds on
29 of 47 references.
References · 29
- 2014Theoretical guarantees for approximate sampling from smooth and log-concave densitiescited by 208
- 2015Non-asymptotic convergence analysis for the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 197
- 2015On the properties of variational approximations of Gibbs posteriorscited by 121
- 2017Sobolev Norm Learning Rates for Regularized Least-Squares Algorithmcited by 114
- 2021The Bayesian Learning Rulecited by 99
- 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 89
- 2020Structured Logconcave Sampling with a Restricted Gaussian Oraclecited by 86
- 2016Variational Fourier features for Gaussian processescited by 85
- 2017Concentration of tempered posteriors and of their variational approximationscited by 66
- 2019Rates of Convergence for Sparse Variational Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 63
- 2015On Sparse variational methods and the Kullback-Leibler divergence between stochastic processescited by 57
- 2020Convergence of Sparse Variational Inference in Gaussian Processes Regressioncited by 53
17 more
- 2015Sampling from a log-concave distribution with Projected Langevin Monte Carlocited by 52
- 2013Streaming Variational Bayescited by 48
- 2015Fast rates in statistical and online learningcited by 47
- 2017Convergence Rates of Variational Posterior Distributionscited by 45
- 2017Sampling from a log-concave distribution with compact support with proximal Langevin Monte Carlocited by 43
- 2017Streaming Sparse Gaussian Process Approximationscited by 41
- 2015Provable Bayesian Inference via Particle Mirror Descentcited by 23
- 2014Optimal low-rank approximations of Bayesian linear inverse problemscited by 22
- 2020Non-exponentially weighted aggregation: regret bounds for unbounded loss functionscited by 18
- 2019A Generalization Bound for Online Variational Inferencecited by 17
- 2021Adaptive variational Bayes: Optimality, computation and applicationscited by 17
- 2024Bayesian Online Natural Gradient (BONG)cited by 14
- 2023Particle-based Online Bayesian Samplingcited by 7
- 2025Adaptive sparse variational approximations for Gaussian process regressioncited by 2
- 2019Online Sampling from Log-Concave Distributionscited by 1
- 2026Bayesian online learning in the one-pass regime: Frequentist validity and uncertainty quantificationcited by 1
- 2026Adaptive Bayesian Online Learning via Expert Aggregationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.