Investigating Knowledge Transfer Across Interactive Dialogue Games
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dialogue games represent a challenging setting where complex cognitive skills are required to accomplish tasks while coordinating with other players. Considering that language represents an interface for both understanding the game rules and executing actions, it is reasonable to assume that training on a specific language game will enhance specific capabilities that might be relevant for other tasks as well. Motivated by this rationale, in this paper, we investigate how knowledge transfers across different dialogue games. We study transferability by finetuning LLM models on games from the clembench suite (Chalamalasetti et al., 2023) and performing two analyses: i) we derive a task-transferability graph using a binary integer optimization program from Zamir et al. (2018), using task performance as the main metric; and ii) we compute task vectors (Ilharco et al., 2022) for each game to study similarities across finetuned models and their task transferability. In our first analysis, we find that some games benefit more from transfer than finetuning, and that the visuospatial family (e.g., exploration games) transfers best. With our task vector analysis instead, we find that similarity-based approaches capture game-role relationships but almost no transferability patterns, suggesting that more complex metrics are required.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.
Builds on
17 of 30 references.
References · 17
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,724
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
- 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
- 2024Fine-Tuning Enhances Existing Mechanisms: A Case Study on Entity Trackingcited by 140
- 2020Intermediate-Task Transfer Learning with Pretrained Models for Natural Language Understanding: When and Why Does It Work?cited by 127
- 2020Exploring and Predicting Transferability across NLP Taskscited by 126
- 2025SPIRAL: Self-Play on Zero-Sum Games Incentivizes Reasoning via Multi-Agent Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 89
- 2025lmgame-Bench: How Good are LLMs at Playing Games?cited by 54
- 2023Clembench: Using Game Play to Evaluate Chat-Optimized Language Models as Conversational Agentscited by 52
- 2023GameEval: Evaluating LLMs on Conversational Gamescited by 35
5 more
- 2025Orak: A Foundational Benchmark for Training and Evaluating LLM Agents on Diverse Video Gamescited by 30
- 2023Dialogue Games for Benchmarking Language Understanding: Motivation, Taxonomy, Strategycited by 12
- 2025Triangulating LLM Progress through Benchmarks, Games, and Cognitive Testscited by 11
- 2025The Price of Thought: A Multilingual Analysis of Reasoning, Performance, and Cost of Negotiation in Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2023Visually Grounded Language Learning: a review of language games, datasets, tasks, and modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.