mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

E2S-Pruner: Progressive Two-Stage Evidence Fusion for Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2608.23253 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models typically encode an image into hundreds of visual tokens, incurring substantial inference latency and GPU memory overhead. Existing pruning methods largely rely on attention scores and directly aggregate outputs across attention heads and network layers, making it difficult to characterize evidential uncertainty and conflict. We propose E2S-Pruner, a progressive two-stage evidence-fusion framework for visual token pruning that requires no auxiliary model, trainable parameters, or fine-tuning. In the first stage, E2S-Pruner treats each attention head as an independent evidence source, estimates its reliability from evidence clarity and inter-head consistency, and represents each visual token using three states: important, unimportant, and uncertain. In the second stage, Dempster--Shafer evidence theory is used to quantify inter-layer conflict and fuse complementary evidence from multiple network layers. We further introduce a spatial novelty constraint that promotes coverage of distinct image regions and prevents the retained tokens from concentrating in a few locally salient areas. On LLaVA-1.5-7B, E2S-Pruner retains 98.0%, 96.8%, and 90.6% of the aggregate performance when the average numbers of retained visual tokens are 192, 128, and 64, respectively, while improving throughput by 1.96x and 2.09x under the 128-token and 64-token settings. Experiments on Qwen2-VL-7B further demonstrate cross-model generalization. Code is available at https://github.com/taoyu-qian/E2S-Pruner.git.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

18 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Variation-aware Vision Token Dropping for Faster Large Vision-Language Models1 Sep
  2. 2025Stop Looking for Important Tokens in Multimodal Language Models: Duplication Matters More17 Feb
  3. 2024SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference6 Oct
  4. 2024LLaVA-PruMerge: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Models22 Mar
  5. 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Models11 Mar

Other references · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  4. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
  5. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  6. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
  7. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
  8. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
  9. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 864
  10. 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 804
  11. 2024VLP: Vision Language Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 126
  12. 2022Multi-Tailed Vision Transformer for Efficient Inferencecited by 10
1 more
  1. 2024ADFQ-ViT: Activation-Distribution-Friendly Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformerscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026OccamToken: Efficient VLM Inference with Training-Free and Budget-Adaptive Token Pruning
  2. 2026From Patching to Pruning Visual Computation in Vision Language Models
  3. 2026Evading Visual Aphasia: Contrastive Adaptive Semantic Token Pruning for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026Not All Attention Heads Contribute to Critical Visual Token Selection: Head-Aware Pruning Matters More
  5. 2026LearnPruner: Rethinking Attention-based Token Pruning in Vision Language Models
  6. 2026How Many Visual Tokens Do Multimodal Language Models Need? Scaling Visual Token Pruning with F^3A
  7. 2026TReVS: Integrating Textual Relevance and Visual Saliency for Efficient Vision-Language Model Token Pruning
  8. 2026When Attention Collapses: Stage-Aware Visual Token Pruning from Structure to Semantics