mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Patching to Pruning Visual Computation in Vision Language Models

arXiv 2610.03389 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision language models (VLMs) incur substantial inference cost because every visual token is processed by the attention and MLP projections of every decoder layer, even when token-specific visual computation is unnecessary at many depths. We introduce Patch-to-Prune (P2P), inspired by Mechanistic Interpretability, a training-free framework that converts activation patching from a diagnostic tool into an inference-time computation bypass. P2P performs validation-guided forward and backward layer sweeps to identify decoder regions whose visual-token projection outputs can be replaced by fixed neutral proxy activation vectors within a user-specified accuracy tolerance. Unlike conventional token-pruning methods, P2P preserves the sequence length, token order, positional information, attention mask, and residual pathways, thereby pruning computation without removing tokens or modifying the pretrained model weights. We evaluate P2P on four VLMs from the Qwen2.5-VL and LLaVA families across seven multi-modal benchmarks using mutually disjoint calibration, validation, and test partitions. P2P at a 3% tolerance retains around 94% of dense accuracy while reducing FLOPs by 55%. Beyond these efficiency gains, our layer-wise analysis suggests that visual processing in VLMs is non-uniformly distributed across decoder depth: early and late layers often require little token-specific visual computation, whereas intermediate layers appear to perform most task-relevant visual integration, enabling later reasoning to rely largely on visual information already embedded in shared residual and textual representations. This makes P2P both an efficient inference framework and a causal lens into visual information processing in VLMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SwiftVLM: Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference via Cross-Layer Token Bypass
  2. 2026RCP: Representation Consistency Pruner for Mitigating Distribution Shift in Large Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026E2S-Pruner: Progressive Two-Stage Evidence Fusion for Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026LearnPruner: Rethinking Attention-based Token Pruning in Vision Language Models
  5. 2025Balanced Token Pruning: Accelerating Vision Language Models Beyond Local Optimization
  6. 2025PLPHP: Per-Layer Per-Head Vision Token Pruning for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025Efficient Vision-Language Reasoning via Adaptive Token Pruning
  8. 2025VScan: Rethinking Visual Token Reduction for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models