mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can We Perform Online RL for Image Editing without Editing Rewards?

arXiv 2608.22780 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) enables direct preference optimization for image editing through editing-specific rewards, which remain less developed due to costly triplet supervision and complex task-dependent calibration. In contrast, text-to-image (T2I) generation benefits from a mature and diverse reward ecosystem spanning semantic alignment, aesthetics, realism, glyph shape, and other visual preferences. Extending this ecosystem to image editing would substantially broaden the range of visual preferences accessible to RL-based optimization, prompting the central question: Can We Perform Image Editing RL without Editing Rewards? In this paper, we argue that the standard image editing dimensions have potential to be mapped to the T2I reward space: image quality can transfer directly, prompt following can be aligned through a description of the desired visual state, and reference consistency admits a coarse semantic conversion by encoding the source content to preserve. However, editing instructions specify relative changes, whereas T2I rewards require self-contained target descriptions; moreover, semantically valid captions from generic vision-language models may be incompatible with the frozen reward. Hence, we further introduce Lever-Edit, a two-stage framework that learns a reward-aligned captioner for counterfactual target descriptions, freezes it, and optimizes the editing policy solely with the transferred T2I reward. Experiments show competitive editing alignment and source preservation against editing-reward-based fine-tuning, while outperforming intuitive transfer baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

21 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Leveraging Verifier-Based Reinforcement Learning in Image Editing30 Apr
  2. 2026Trust Your Critic: Robust Reward Modeling and Reinforcement Learning for Faithful Image Editing and Generation12 Mar
  3. 2025EditReward: A Human-Aligned Reward Model for Instruction-Guided Image Editing30 Sep
  4. 2025EditScore: Unlocking Online RL for Image Editing via High-Fidelity Reward Modeling28 Sep
  5. 2025Alignment and Safety of Diffusion Models via Reinforcement Learning and Reward Modeling: A Survey23 May
  6. 2025DanceGRPO: Unleashing GRPO on Visual Generation12 May
  7. 2023Human Preference Score: Better Aligning Text-to-Image Models with Human Preference25 Mar

Other references · 14

  1. 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 3,614
  2. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  3. 2025FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Spacecited by 1,006
  4. 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignmentcited by 972
  5. 2025Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RLcited by 661
  6. 2025Step1X-Edit: A Practical Framework for General Image Editingcited by 429
  7. 2024Diffusion Model-Based Image Editing: A Surveycited by 212
  8. 2024GenAI Arena: An Open Evaluation Platform for Generative Modelscited by 82
  9. 2025Advantage Weighted Matching: Aligning RL with Pretraining in Diffusion Modelscited by 67
  10. 2026TextPecker: Rewarding Structural Anomaly Quantification for Enhancing Visual Text Renderingcited by 15
  11. 2026UniGRPO: Unified Policy Optimization for Reasoning-Driven Visual Generationcited by 13
  12. 2025RealGen: Photorealistic Text-to-Image Generation via Detector-Guided Rewardscited by 12
2 more
  1. 2026SpatialReward: Bridging the Perception Gap in Online RL for Image Editing via Explicit Spatial Reasoningcited by 7
  2. 2026Do Less, Achieve More: Do We Need Every-Step Optimization for RL Fine-tuning of Diffusion Models?cited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Promise of RL for Autoregressive Image Editing
  2. 2026Edit-R2: Context-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Image Editing
  3. 2026RetouchIQ: MLLM Agents for Instruction-Based Image Retouching with Generalist Reward
  4. 2026Evaluation-Verification Reward for Consistent Multi-Reference Image Editing
  5. 2025UniGen-1.5: Enhancing Image Generation and Editing through Reward Unification in Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Qwen-Image-2.0-RL Technical Report
  7. 2026ImageEdit-R1: Boosting Multi-Agent Image Editing via Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Scalable Minimal-Change Learning for Controllable Image Editing