Sorting from Counterexamples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Consider the following problem of learning an unknown linear order on n items. In each round, the learner guesses a complete ordering of the items and receives either confirmation that the guess is correct or a counterexample: a pair of items in the wrong order. The goal is to identify the unknown order using as few queries as possible. We study this problem when up to k of the returned counterexamples may be untruthful, where k is not known in advance. We determine the optimal query complexity up to constant factors: [ Theta(nlog n + nk). ] Thus, while the noiseless complexity matches the classical complexity of sorting, each untruthful counterexample incurs an additional cost of order n. The upper bound is based on a geometric representation of permutations and Gr"unbaum's theorem, while the lower bound combines sorting arguments with a Condorcet-type construction. We also study the case where the target ranking has a low-dimensional geometric representation: each item is represented by a point in ℝd, and the ranking is obtained by projecting the points onto an unknown direction. For these classes we give an upper bound of O(d2log n+dk) and a lower bound of Omega(dlog n+dk), leaving a factor of d gap in the noiseless term.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2026.
Builds on
13 of 43 references.
References · 13
- 2020Proper Learning, Helly Number, and an Optimal SVM Boundcited by 53
- 2017Active classification with comparison queriescited by 27
- 2019The Power of Comparisons for Actively Learning Linear Classifierscited by 20
- 2021Online Learning with Simple Predictors and a Combinatorial Characterization of Minimax in 0/1 Gamescited by 18
- 2020Noise-tolerant, Reliable Active Classification with Comparison Queriescited by 17
- 2023Optimal Sample Complexity of Contrastive Learningcited by 15
- 2017On Communication Complexity of Classification Problemscited by 11
- 2014When is it Better to Compare than to Score?cited by 9
- 2016Learning Combinatorial Functions from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 7
- 2026What Does Preference Learning Recover from Pairwise Comparison Data?cited by 3
- 2018Simple and Fast Algorithms for Interactive Machine Learning with Random Counter-examplescited by 2
- 2023Applications of Littlestone dimension to query learning and to compressioncited by 2
1 more
- 2026Learning from Equivalence Queries, Revisitedcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.