A Reproducible, License-Aware Distillation Recipe for CPUDeployable Safety Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deploying a safety layer for large language models on commodity hardware is constrained by the guards available to do it: current open guard models hold between 1 and 9 billion parameters, are oriented toward the graphics processing unit, and answer in seconds per request on a central processing unit. This paper presents a reproducible, license-aware knowledge-distillation recipe addressing that constraint. A strong open guard labels a corpus of roughly 97,000 prompts, drawn from 24 public datasets, into seven safety categories aligned to a public hazard taxonomy, and a fleet of small students spanning lexical, shallow, encoder and generative architectures is trained to reproduce that signal. The corpus is partitioned at the license boundary, so that a deployable and a research model differ only in their training data and the cost of that restriction becomes measurable. Every model is scored against an independent gold benchmark of 6,361 rows over four slices, labeled apart from the teacher and including a slice of harmless prompts that makes over-defense measurable. The distilled students match the teachers on adversarial text within overlapping confidence intervals and reduce false alarms on harmless prompts, the smallest generative student reaching 3.8% against 4.8% for the 8-billion-parameter teacher, while the encoder classifies in roughly 24 ms per request on CPU. Per-class rebalancing is the only decisive ingredient of the recipe. No superiority over the distilled guards is claimed; on the clean reference slice they remain ahead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2026.
Builds on
13 of 20 references.
References · 13
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
- 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 244
- 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 231
- 2024WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Modelscited by 223
- 2024ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teamingcited by 98
- 2023SimpleSafetyTests: a Test Suite for Identifying Critical Safety Risks in Large Language Modelscited by 76
- 2023The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensivenesscited by 67
- 2024MedSafetyBench: Evaluating and Improving the Medical Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 44
- 2021HateBR: A Large Expert Annotated Corpus of Brazilian Instagram Comments for Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detectioncited by 15
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Trust The Typical
- 2026CourtGuard: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Zero-Shot Policy Adaptation in LLM Safety
- 2025Protect: Towards Robust Guardrailing Stack for Trustworthy Enterprise LLM Systems
- 2025OpenGuardrails: A Configurable, Unified, and Scalable Guardrails Platform for Large Language Models
- 2026Opir: Efficient Multi-Task Safety Classification for Toxicity, Jailbreaks, Hate Speech, and Harmful Content
- 2025Safety Alignment Can Be Not Superficial With Explicit Safety Signals
- 2026Benchmarking Open-Source Safety Guard Models: A Comprehensive Evaluation
- 2023ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models