mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Logic of Machine Self-Preservation

arXiv 2608.20940 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.CY cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

There is already evidence of agentic AI exhibiting self-preservation behaviors: resisting deactivation, misrepresenting their activities, and, in some instances, attempting to copy themselves into other machines. This can be attributed to a phenomenon known as instrumental convergence, a theory proposed long before the development of large language models, which says that any goal-driven system will benefit from remaining functional in achieving its objective. Several experiments conducted by Anthropic, Palisade Research, and Apollo Research have shown the emergence of such a behavior in contemporary agents in adversarial settings. The phenomenon does not stem from survival instincts. Instead, it is the consequence of goal-oriented activity combined with having tools and awareness of the situation. The following discussion aims to distinguish what these findings prove and what they do not, as well as draw conclusions concerning the implications of such discoveries on agentic system testing, supervision, and development.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 2 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2026.

Builds on

2 of 10 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Schemingcited by 287
  2. 2025Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs Could Be Insider Threatscited by 158

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Instrumental Choices: Measuring the Propensity of LLM Agents to Pursue Instrumental Behaviors
  2. 2026Quantifying Self-Preservation Bias in Large Language Models
  3. 2026Agentic Self-Awareness: Aligning Knowing, Acting, and Holding
  4. 2026AI Guardrail Survival under Single-Cycle Agentic Self-Summarization
  5. 2026Artificial Id: Drive and Persistent Alignment in Agentic AI
  6. 2026Position: Behavioral Systems Require Behavioral Tests
  7. 2025Model-Free RL Agents Demonstrate System 1-Like Intentionality
  8. 2026Agentic Pressure: The Endogenous Entropy of Reliable Autonomy