Artificial Id: Drive and Persistent Alignment in Agentic AI
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic AI is moving from bounded task execution toward systems that retain consequential state, continue operating and adapt across task boundaries. That shift creates a control problem that current harnesses largely solve by hand: objectives, retries, verification, stopping rules and other behavioral transitions are specified externally. We propose an artificial id, an adaptive internal drive for determining whether behavior should continue, stop or change. In a minimal virtual Petri-dish experiment, a controller too small to perform general-purpose reasoning and receiving no task-specific behavioral objective develops useful control through differential persistence. The same mechanism selects an unintended physical strategy when that behavior persists better and later replaces a learned sensor mapping when its environmental meaning changes. These results show that adaptive direction can emerge without being explicitly specified as a behavioral objective. The same persistence that makes such adaptive agency useful can also allow misalignment, corrupted state and unintended behavior to persist across task boundaries. A scalable artificial id would carry consequential state and adaptive drive across those boundaries, making alignment a property of the continuing agentic system rather than of a model response or single trajectory. Such systems require a persistent alignment boundary over trusted observations, consequence channels, persistent state, authority, identity, provenance and hard constraints.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.
Builds on
15 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agents29 May
- 2023Evaluating Language-Model Agents on Realistic Autonomous Tasks18 Dec
Other references · 13
- 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 551
- 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 542
- 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approachcited by 415
- 2018Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Controlcited by 274
- 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 274
- 2021Embodied Intelligence via Learning and Evolutioncited by 163
- 2023Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Spacecited by 138
- 2019Reward Tampering Problems and Solutions in Reinforcement Learning: A Causal Influence Diagram Perspectivecited by 108
- 2024Here Comes The AI Worm: Unleashing Zero-click Worms that Target GenAI-Powered Applicationscited by 59
- 2022Discovering Agentscited by 28
- 2023Natural Selection Favors AIs over Humanscited by 24
- 2017Embodied Evolution in Collective Robotics: A Reviewcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Consistent Plan-Act for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks
- 2026Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems
- 2026The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities
- 2026One Gate Is Not Enough: Composing Stateful Pre-Action Controls for Agentic AI
- 2026Layered Mutability: Continuity and Governance in Persistent Self-Modifying Agents
- 2026Agents in the Large: Perception-Centered Architecture for Persistent Agents
- 2026Agentic Self-Awareness: Aligning Knowing, Acting, and Holding
- 2026DynaHarness: A Dynamic Physical Harness for Self-Evolving Robot Agents