Reliable Neural Collapse Approximation for Open-World Test-Time Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) methods aim to bridge the domain gap between the source and target domains. However, traditional TTA methods become ineffective when the label distribution shift occurs, a challenge commonly referred to as an open-world scenario. In this paper, we introduce a new method named Reliable Neural Collapse approximation (ReNC) for Open-World Test-Time Adaptation (OWTTA). Specifically, we leverage neural collapse as a structural prior for reliable target-domain adaptation. Guided by this prior, we justify that the pre-trained classifier weights can serve as the prototypes of the source domain. By measuring the similarity between samples and prototypes, we filter out the Out-Of-Distribution~(OOD) samples for reliable updates. Furthermore, we propose a neural collapse approximation mechanism to refine these prototypes, ensuring they can gradually adapt to the target domain while maintaining the neural collapse structure. Extensive experiments on several open-world benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method. Our empirical analysis suggests that ReNC better preserves NC-related properties in the target domain, providing useful evidence for explaining reliable OWTTA and offering new insights for model design. Code is available at https://github.com/JiaqiLin-AI/ReNC.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.
Builds on
57 of 76 references.
References · 57
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 683
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 600
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
38 more
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2017VisDA: The Visual Domain Adaptation Challengecited by 435
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 405
- 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
- 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 339
- 2022VOS: Learning What You Don't Know by Virtual Outlier Synthesiscited by 300
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
- 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 227
- 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 220
- 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 212
- 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 189
- 2020Universal Domain Adaptation through Self Supervisioncited by 172
- 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 151
- 2020Self-Supervised Policy Adaptation during Deploymentcited by 123
- 2020Better Aggregation in Test-Time Augmentationcited by 122
- 2022POEM: Out-of-Distribution Detection with Posterior Samplingcited by 108
- 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 104
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
- 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersioncited by 83
- 2022Are All Losses Created Equal: A Neural Collapse Perspectivecited by 78
- 2022Unified Optimal Transport Framework for Universal Domain Adaptationcited by 57
- 2020Learning Loss for Test-Time Augmentationcited by 56
- 2019Out-of-distribution Detection in Classifiers via Generationcited by 49
- 2022Revisiting Realistic Test-Time Training: Sequential Inference and Adaptation by Anchored Clusteringcited by 44
- 2022ActMAD: Activation Matching to Align Distributions for Test-Time-Trainingcited by 41
- 2023Towards Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation Utilizing the Wisdom of Crowds in Entropy Minimizationcited by 39
- 2023On the Robustness of Open-World Test-Time Training: Self-Training with Dynamic Prototype Expansioncited by 34
- 2023Towards Real-World Test-Time Adaptation: Tri-Net Self-Training with Balanced Normalizationcited by 34
- 2025Model Adaptation: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation without Source Datacited by 34
- 2023Test-Time Domain Adaptation by Learning Domain-Aware Batch Normalizationcited by 31
- 2023Upcycling Models under Domain and Category Shiftcited by 29
- 2022Robustifying Vision Transformer without Retraining from Scratch by Test-Time Class-Conditional Feature Alignmentcited by 27
- 2024LEAD: Learning Decomposition for Source-free Universal Domain Adaptationcited by 25
- 2021UMAD: Universal Model Adaptation under Domain and Category Shiftcited by 23
- 2022How Useful are Gradients for OOD Detection Really?cited by 20
- 2023Revisiting Realistic Test-Time Training: Sequential Inference and Adaptation by Anchored Clustering Regularized Self-Trainingcited by 19
50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.