Beyond Trial Averaging: Anchoring Neural and Visual Representations for Few-Repetition Brain-to-Image Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decoding visual information from brain signals probes neural representations and enables neuro-rehabilitation and dream decoding. Recent brain-to-image retrieval approaches have achieved promising performance, typically by averaging many (up to 80) neural trials per image, requiring repeated stimulus presentation that increases latency, cost, and user burden. When only one or a few repetitions are available, the retrieval accuracy drops sharply. This drop is commonly attributed to query noise because averaging suppresses noise and increases signal stability. However, we find a non-transitive alignment pattern: the low-repetition query signal and the image representation each align with the high-repetition center, but not directly with each other. This pattern shows that query noise is only part of the problem and that gallery placement also affects retrieval. We therefore propose a neural-anchor-based retrieval (NEAR) framework that treats the high-repetition center as an anchor and approaches it from both sides: a denoiser pulls the noisy query toward the true anchor, and a small network predicts each candidate's pseudo anchor from its image and pulls the image toward it. Across four datasets spanning EEG, MEG and fMRI, NEAR consistently improved retrieval in the few-repetition regime. On THINGS-EEG2, it improved 200-way Top-1 accuracy by 5.7 and 9.3 percentage points respectively, when averaging one and four repetitions. By anchoring neural and visual representations, NEAR reduces reliance on repeated acquisition and brings neural retrieval closer to real-world deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.
Builds on
12 of 26 references.
References · 12
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2018Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Datacited by 533
- 2023Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion Priorscited by 160
- 2024MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of Datacited by 109
- 2023Decoding Natural Images from EEG for Object Recognitioncited by 81
- 2024Visual Decoding and Reconstruction via EEG Embeddings with Guided Diffusioncited by 81
- 2025Bridging the Vision-Brain Gap with an Uncertainty-Aware Blur Priorcited by 29
- 2025Scaling laws for decoding images from brain activitycited by 22
- 2024Finding Shared Decodable Concepts and their Negations in the Braincited by 6
- 2025NeuroCLIP: Brain-Inspired Prompt Tuning for EEG-to-Image Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 6
- 2026Aligning What EEG Can See: Structural Representations for Brain-Vision Matchingcited by 5
- 2026Rethinking Brain Decoding with CLIP: The Role of Adversarial Robustnesscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.