mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Brain Decoding with CLIP: The Role of Adversarial Robustness

arXiv 2607.03165 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Brain decoding aims to uncover neural mechanisms by inferring stimulus-related representations from brain signals. In fMRI studies, this is typically achieved by mapping fMRI responses to the latent representations of computational models. Recently, CLIP has become a popular choice for brain decoding due to its rich vision--language embedding space. However, aligning fMRI signals with CLIP representations remains challenging. As CLIP is not explicitly optimized for neural alignment, its representations may capture statistically predictive cues that are only partially reflected in brain activity, limiting decoding performance. In this paper, we investigate whether adversarially robust representations improve neural decoding with CLIP. Adversarial training suppresses non-robust features and promotes more stable, perceptually structured representations, which may better align with brain activity. We evaluate this by fixing the fMRI decoder and varying only the target representation (standard CLIP vs. robust variants) on fMRI-image retrieval and zero-shot classification tasks across NSD and GOD datasets. Empirical results show that this simple change consistently improves task performance and yields stronger alignment across multiple metrics. Attribution analysis further reveals consistently low agreement between standard CLIP and its robust variants, suggesting that adversarial robustness reorganizes feature importance in the visual representation. These findings suggest that the choice of target representation influences neural decoding performance and that adversarial robustness may serve as a useful criterion for brain decoding.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.

Builds on

35 of 54 references.

References · 35

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  5. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  6. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  7. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  8. 2019A Baseline for Few-Shot Image Classificationcited by 298
  9. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  10. 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
  11. 2023Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion Priorscited by 160
  12. 2015Generic decoding of seen and imagined objects using hierarchical visual featurescited by 120
23 more
  1. 2024Robust CLIP: Unsupervised Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Vision Embeddings for Robust Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 120
  2. 2022Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Modelscited by 117
  3. 2023A Closer Look at the Explainability of Contrastive Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 96
  4. 2023On the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Image Adversarial Attackscited by 92
  5. 2019On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretabilitycited by 80
  6. 2024MindBridge: A Cross-Subject Brain Decoding Frameworkcited by 66
  7. 2018Decoding Brain Representations by Multimodal Learning of Neural Activity and Visual Featurescited by 52
  8. 2019Learning From Brains How to Regularize Machinescited by 38
  9. 2024A Sober Look at the Robustness of CLIPs to Spurious Featurescited by 38
  10. 2025Bridging the Vision-Brain Gap with an Uncertainty-Aware Blur Priorcited by 29
  11. 2023Spatial-frequency channels, shape bias, and adversarial robustnesscited by 28
  12. 2024NeuroClips: Towards High-fidelity and Smooth fMRI-to-Video Reconstructioncited by 26
  13. 2019Bridging Adversarial Robustness and Gradient Interpretabilitycited by 22
  14. 2018Interpreting Encoding and Decoding Modelscited by 21
  15. 2023Adversarial Examples Are Not Real Featurescited by 16
  16. 2024Spurious reconstruction from brain activitycited by 15
  17. 2024NeuralDiffuser: Neuroscience-inspired Diffusion Guidance for fMRI Visual Reconstructioncited by 10
  18. 2023An Extended Study of Human-like Behavior under Adversarial Trainingcited by 9
  19. 2025A Survey on fMRI-based Brain Decoding for Reconstructing Multimodal Stimulicited by 7
  20. 2024Finding Shared Decodable Concepts and their Negations in the Braincited by 6
  21. 2025Meta-Learning an In-Context Transformer Model of Human Higher Visual Cortexcited by 4
  22. 2024Brain-aligning of semantic vectors improves neural decoding of visual stimulicited by 2
  23. 2024Limited but consistent gains in adversarial robustness by co-training object recognition models with human EEGcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.