Finding Shared Decodable Concepts and their Negations in the Brain
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prior work has offered evidence for functional localization in the brain; different anatomical regions preferentially activate for certain types of visual input. For example, the fusiform face area preferentially activates for visual stimuli that include a face. However, the spectrum of visual semantics is extensive, and only a few semantically-tuned patches of cortex have so far been identified in the human brain. Using a multimodal (natural language and image) neural network architecture (CLIP) we train a highly accurate contrastive model that maps brain responses during naturalistic image viewing to CLIP embeddings. We then use a novel adaptation of the DBSCAN clustering algorithm to cluster the parameters of these participant-specific contrastive models. This reveals what we call Shared Decodable Concepts (SDCs): clusters in CLIP space that are decodable from common sets of voxels across multiple participants. Examining the images most and least associated with each SDC cluster gives us additional insight into the semantic properties of each SDC. We note SDCs for previously reported visual features (e.g. orientation tuning in early visual cortex) as well as visual semantic concepts such as faces, places and bodies. In cases where our method finds multiple clusters for a visuo-semantic concept, the least associated images allow us to dissociate between confounding factors. For example, we discovered two clusters of food images, one driven by color, the other by shape. We also uncover previously unreported areas such as regions of extrastriate body area (EBA) tuned for legs/hands and sensitivity to numerosity in right intraparietal sulcus, and more. Thus, our contrastive-learning methodology better characterizes new and existing visuo-semantic representations in the brain by leveraging multimodal neural network representations and a novel adaptation of clustering algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.
Builds on
5 of 18 references.
References · 5
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2023BrainCLIP: Bridging Brain and Visual-Linguistic Representation Via CLIP for Generic Natural Visual Stimulus Decodingcited by 36
- 2023BrainSCUBA: Fine-Grained Natural Language Captions of Visual Cortex Selectivitycited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2024Brain Mapping with Dense Features: Grounding Cortical Semantic Selectivity in Natural Images With Vision Transformerscited by 13
- 2024Reanimating Images using Neural Representations of Dynamic Stimulicited by 5
- 2025Meta-Learning an In-Context Transformer Model of Human Higher Visual Cortexcited by 4
- 2026Meta-learning In-Context Enables Training-Free Cross Subject Brain Decodingcited by 1
- 2026Rethinking Brain Decoding with CLIP: The Role of Adversarial Robustnesscited by 1
- 2026Beyond Trial Averaging: Anchoring Neural and Visual Representations for Few-Repetition Brain-to-Image Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Trial Averaging: Anchoring Neural and Visual Representations for Few-Repetition Brain-to-Image Retrieval19 Aug 2026
- 2026Rethinking Brain Decoding with CLIP: The Role of Adversarial Robustness3 Jul 2026
- 2026Meta-learning In-Context Enables Training-Free Cross Subject Brain Decoding9 Apr 2026
- 2025Meta-Learning an In-Context Transformer Model of Human Higher Visual Cortex21 May 2025
- 2024Brain Mapping with Dense Features: Grounding Cortical Semantic Selectivity in Natural Images With Vision Transformers7 Oct 2024
- 2024Reanimating Images using Neural Representations of Dynamic Stimuli4 Jun 2024