What Can Artificial Intelligence Learn from Medicine? Generative Analogies and Reliable Machine Learning Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the past few years, machine learning (ML) has been widely (and to an extent, successfully) implemented in medicine. However, uncertainties surrounding ML have made it difficult to establish the bases of its epistemic and methodological warrants. In the literature, a parallel has been drawn between medicine and ML, suggesting that we should model epistemic and methodological standards for ML on the standards of clinical translation. By developing tools from Hesse work, we characterise the nature of this parallel as a generative analogy between the process of clinical translation and the process of building ML systems. We identify more precisely the epistemic and methodological warrants of clinical translation that are typically only mentioned when appealing to the analogy, and we show in which sense such warrants apply analogically to the context of ML. In particular, we interpret warrants of clinical translation in reliabilist terms, and we show how this can inform a new form of ML reliabilism, which is distinct from (though compatible with) existing reliabilist accounts in philosophy of AI.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.
Builds on
3 of 32 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.