Machine Learning and Theory Ladenness -- A Phenomenological Account
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We provide an analysis of theory ladenness in machine learning in science, where "theory", that we call "domain theory", refers to the domain knowledge of the scientific discipline where ML is used. By constructing an account of ML models based on a comparison with phenomenological models, we show, against recent trends in philosophy of science, that ML model-building is mostly indifferent to domain theory, even if the model remains theory laden in a weak sense, which we call theory infection. These claims, we argue, have far-reaching consequences for the transferability of ML across scientific disciplines, and shift the priorities of the debate on theory ladenness in ML from descriptive to normative.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2024.
Builds on
6 of 93 references.
References · 6
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2022Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problemscited by 107
- 2020The Pragmatic Turn in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)cited by 53
- 2022Scientific Inference With Interpretable Machine Learning: Analyzing Models to Learn About Real-World Phenomenacited by 21
- 2020Statistical modeling: the three culturescited by 18
- 2023Promises and pitfalls of deep neural networks in neuroimaging-based psychiatric researchcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.