mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models with Mild Semantic Noise

arXiv 2508.04677 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt tuning has shown promising results, but its robustness and generalization to unseen categories remain limited. Through our experiments, we demonstrate that the complete removal of semantic noise is a key factor restricting robustness. Existing methods typically suppress or filter out semantic noise in the prompt space, inadvertently hindering the model's robustness and its ability to generalize to unseen categories. To address this, we propose ANPrompt, a robust prompt tuning framework that actively incorporates weak semantic noise. By clustering weakly perturbed features into noise prompts and integrating them with learnable tokens in both the text and vision encoders, ANPrompt ensures controlled exposure to semantic variations. To enhance the visual pathway, we introduce the Noise-Resistant Visual Prompt Prototype (NRVPP), which stabilizes visual semantics under weak perturbations. Additionally, we propose a Weak Alignment Loss (WALoss) at the logits level to enforce consistency between clean and perturbed predictions, providing stable supervision. By combining weak semantic noise exposure with logits-based consistency, ANPrompt prevents overfitting to specific phrasings while preserving semantic integrity. Extensive experiments across 11 benchmarks, including base-to-new splits, show that ANPrompt consistently outperforms existing prompt tuning methods, offering superior robustness to semantic noise and improved generalization across tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 10 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

Builds on

10 of 75 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025OpenworldAUC: Towards Unified Evaluation and Optimization for Open-world Prompt Tuning8 May
  2. 2025Rethinking Few-Shot Adaptation of Vision-Language Models in Two Stages14 Mar
  3. 2024Learning to Prompt with Text Only Supervision for Vision-Language Models4 Jan

Other references · 7

  1. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  2. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 804
  3. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 627
  4. 2024LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Stepcited by 454
  5. 2025Beyond Chemical QA: Evaluating LLM's Chemical Reasoning with Modular Chemical Operationscited by 49
  6. 2024Advancing Textual Prompt Learning with Anchored Attributescited by 20
  7. 2024ComKD-CLIP: Comprehensive Knowledge Distillation for Contrastive Language-Image Pre-traning Modelcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Seeing is Believing: Robust Vision-Guided Cross-Modal Prompt Learning under Label Noise
  2. 2023Why Is Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models Robust to Noisy Labels?
  3. 2026Noise-aware few-shot learning through bi-directional multi-view prompt alignment
  4. 2025A Closer Look at Conditional Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Intrinsic Gradient Suppression for Label-Noise Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2023Patch-Prompt Aligned Bayesian Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2024Generalizable Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024Nemesis: Normalizing the Soft-prompt Vectors of Vision-Language Models