mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Le Critique: Privileged Value Functions for LLM Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2608.16739 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning algorithms for Large Language Models (LLMs) are largely distinguished by their variance reduction strategy. Group-relative methods like GRPO reduce gradient variance by sampling multiple rollouts per prompt, but provide only sequence-level credit. Training is also blocked by straggler rollouts, reducing throughput and increasing off-policyness. Learned value functions theoretically address both problems, providing token-level advantages without requiring large groups. However, additional infrastructure engineering challenges combined with the practical success of critic-free methods have made it difficult to justify their inclusion in RL pipelines. We propose two complementary strategies to improve the performance of value function RL: 1) Privileged Value Functions (PVF) which provide an elegant mechanism to inject additional task-relevant token-level signal without biasing the policy objective; 2) TETHER, a baseline that adaptively interpolates between group-relative and value baselines depending on the value function accuracy. Across several reasoning tasks, both strategies consistently improve over the standard value function baseline, and are competitive with or outperform mean-baseline GRPO.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.

Builds on

28 of 42 references.

References · 28

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  6. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  7. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  9. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  10. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  11. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  12. 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
16 more
  1. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 450
  2. 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 386
  3. 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 380
  4. 2017Asymmetric Actor Critic for Image-Based Robot Learningcited by 202
  5. 2024VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMscited by 168
  6. 2024Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RLcited by 136
  7. 2025REASONING GYM: Reasoning Environments for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 121
  8. 2025SWEET-RL: Training Multi-Turn LLM Agents on Collaborative Reasoning Taskscited by 108
  9. 2025What's Behind PPO's Collapse in Long-CoT? Value Optimization Holds the Secretcited by 95
  10. 2025CodeI/O: Condensing Reasoning Patterns via Code Input-Output Predictioncited by 54
  11. 2026The Many Faces of On-Policy Distillation: Pitfalls, Mechanisms, and Fixescited by 37
  12. 2021Unbiased Asymmetric Reinforcement Learning under Partial Observabilitycited by 24
  13. 2026V1: Unifying Generation and Self-Verification for Parallel Reasonerscited by 12
  14. 2026EVPO: Explained Variance Policy Optimization for Adaptive Critic Utilization in LLM Post-Trainingcited by 6
  15. 2026Faster Synchronous On-Policy RL via Straggler-Aware Group Sizingcited by 2
  16. 2026Do You Really Need to Pretrain Q-Functions for Online RL Fine-Tuning?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

  1. 2026Trust the Critic Morecited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026BASIS: Batchwise Advantage Estimation from Single-Rollout Information Sharing for LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025Planning without Search: Refining Frontier LLMs with Offline Goal-Conditioned RL
  3. 2025Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regression
  4. 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Survey
  5. 2026VIMPO: Value-Implicit Policy Optimization for LLMs
  6. 2026Enhanced LLM Reasoning by Optimizing Reward Functions with Search-Driven Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Kernelized Advantage Estimation: From Nonparametric Statistics to LLM Reasoning
  8. 2026Value-Gradient Hypothesis of RL for LLMs