Predicting, Evaluating, and Explaining Top Misinformation Spreaders via Archetypal User Behavior
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The spread of misinformation on social networks poses a significant challenge to online communities and society at large. Not all users contribute equally to this phenomenon: a small number of highly effective individuals can exert outsized influence, amplifying false narratives and contributing to significant societal harm. This paper seeks to mitigate the spread of misinformation by enabling proactive interventions, identifying and ranking users according to key behavioral indicators associated with harmful content dissemination. We examine three user archetypes -- amplifiers, super-spreaders, and coordinated accounts -- each characterized by distinct behavioral patterns in the dissemination of misinformation. These are not mutually exclusive, and individual users may exhibit characteristics of multiple archetypes. We develop and evaluate several user ranking models, each aligned with a specific archetype, and find that super-spreader traits consistently dominate the top ranks among the most influential misinformation spreaders. As we move down the ranking, however, the interplay of multiple archetypes becomes more prominent. Additionally, we demonstrate the critical role of temporal dynamics in predictive performance, and introduce methods that reduce data requirements by minimizing the observation window needed for accurate forecasting. Finally, we demonstrate the utility and benefits of explainable AI (XAI) techniques, integrating multiple archetypal traits into a unified model to enhance interpretability and offer deeper insight into the key factors driving misinformation propagation. Our findings provide actionable tools for identifying potentially harmful users and guiding content moderation strategies, enabling platforms to monitor accounts of concern more effectively.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
38 of 63 references.
References · 38
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2014The Rise of Social Botscited by 96
- 2020The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemiccited by 64
- 2020Uncovering Coordinated Networks on Social Media: Methods and Case Studiescited by 49
- 2020Identifying Coordinated Accounts on Social Media through Hidden Influence and Group Behaviourscited by 47
- 2022Multi-modal Misinformation Detection: Approaches, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 15
- 2023Unmasking the Web of Deceit: Uncovering Coordinated Activity to Expose Information Operations on Twittercited by 13
- 2022Moral Emotions Shape the Virality of COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Mediacited by 12
- 2021The Spread of Propaganda by Coordinated Communities on Social Mediacited by 10
- 2019Red Bots Do It Better: Comparative Analysis of Social Bot Partisan Behaviorcited by 9
- 2022"This is Fake! Shared it by Mistake": Assessing the Intent of Fake News Spreaderscited by 9
- 2023Tracking Fringe and Coordinated Activity on Twitter Leading Up To the US Capitol Attackcited by 9
26 more
- 2021SCARLET: Explainable Attention based Graph Neural Network for Fake News spreader predictioncited by 8
- 2022VaccinEU: COVID-19 vaccine conversations on Twitter in French, German and Italiancited by 8
- 2024A Semi-supervised Fake News Detection using Sentiment Encoding and LSTM with Self-Attentioncited by 8
- 2020The COVID-19 Infodemic: Twitter versus Facebookcited by 7
- 2021Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Social Media through Psychological and Motivational Factorscited by 7
- 2022Identifying and Characterizing Behavioral Classes of Radicalization within the QAnon Conspiracy on Twittercited by 7
- 2024Exposing Cross-Platform Coordinated Inauthentic Activity in the Run-Up to the 2024 U.S. Electioncited by 7
- 2019Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tacticscited by 6
- 2023Temporal Dynamics of Coordinated Online Behavior: Stability, Archetypes, and Influencecited by 6
- 2023Susceptibility to Unreliable Information Sources: Swift Adoption with Minimal Exposurecited by 6
- 2025Synthetic Politics: Prevalence, Spreaders, and Emotional Reception of AI-Generated Political Images on Xcited by 6
- 2020Exposure to Social Engagement Metrics Increases Vulnerability to Misinformationcited by 5
- 2022One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Longitudinal Studycited by 5
- 2023TieFake: Title-Text Similarity and Emotion-Aware Fake News Detectioncited by 5
- 2024The Susceptibility Paradox in Online Social Influencecited by 4
- 2024IOHunter: Graph Foundation Model to Uncover Online Information Operationscited by 4
- 2025Beyond Interaction Patterns: Assessing Claims of Coordinated Inter-State Information Operations on Twitter/Xcited by 4
- 2025Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior on TikTok: Challenges and Opportunities for Detection in a Video-First Ecosystemcited by 4
- 2022Identifying and characterizing superspreaders of low-credibility content on Twittercited by 3
- 2023Coordinated Information Campaigns on Social Media: A Multifaceted Framework for Detection and Analysiscited by 3
- 2020Detecting Fake News Spreaders in Social Networks using Inductive Representation Learningcited by 2
- 2021Beyond network centrality: Individual-level behavioral traits for predicting information superspreaders in social mediacited by 2
- 2023The Interconnected Nature of Online Harm and Moderation: Investigating the Cross-Platform Spread of Harmful Content between YouTube and Twittercited by 2
- 2024Uncovering Coordinated Cross-Platform Information Operations Threatening the Integrity of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election Online Discussioncited by 2
- 2023The connection between the spread of misinformation, time of day, and individual user activity patternscited by 1
- 2025Agent-Based Simulations of Online Political Discussions: A Case Study on Elections in Germanycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Digital cloning of online social networks for language-sensitive agent-based modeling of misinformation spread
- 2020Network Inference from a Mixture of Diffusion Models for Fake News Mitigation
- 2025Persuasion at Play: Understanding Misinformation Dynamics in Demographic-Aware Human-LLM Interactions
- 2024The Stepwise Deception: Simulating the Evolution from True News to Fake News with LLM Agents
- 2024Large Language Model-driven Multi-Agent Simulation for News Diffusion Under Different Network Structures
- 2025Simulating Misinformation Vulnerabilities With Agent Personas
- 2026Overstating Attitudes, Ignoring Networks: LLM Biases in Simulating Misinformation Susceptibility
- 2026You Can't Fool Us: Understanding the Resilience of LLM-driven Agent Communities to Misinformation