Beat the Counter First: A Baseline for Temporal-Graph Anomaly Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Progress in streaming, edge-level graph anomaly detection (GAD) has been marked by increasingly elaborate architectures, from count-min-sketch chi square tests to memory-augmented attention networks. Yet the empirical gains attributable to this added complexity have not been systematically evaluated. We propose SimpleCount, a reference with no parameter fitting that selects one scalar feature per dataset from a fixed pool of counts, recencies, first-occurrence indicators, and count-derived transforms. We compare SimpleCount with two temporal-graph detector models and an IsoForest control fitted to the complete feature vector across five public datasets and one synthetic dataset. SimpleCount matches or exceeds SLADE on three of six datasets and exceeds IsoForest on all six. We report paired statistical tests and five-seed SLADE evaluations. SLADE requires 23 to 133x more wall-clock time than SimpleCount. On Synth-Triangle and an additional Synth-Quad probe, pre-event structural scores recover the planted signal at AUC up to 0.955, while all evaluated detector models remain near random. The benefit of complexity is dataset-dependent, and every claimed gain should be reported against a strong one-feature reference together with its compute cost.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2026.
Builds on
17 of 25 references.
References · 17
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 521
- 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 454
- 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 443
- 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 141
- 2022Towards Better Evaluation for Dynamic Link Predictioncited by 120
- 2018Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarshipcited by 107
- 2023GADBench: Revisiting and Benchmarking Supervised Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 57
- 2019MIDAS: Microcluster-Based Detector of Anomalies in Edge Streamscited by 29
- 2020F-FADE: Frequency Factorization for Anomaly Detection in Edge Streamscited by 26
- 2024SLADE: Detecting Dynamic Anomalies in Edge Streams without Labels via Self-Supervised Learningcited by 14
5 more
- 2025On the Power of Heuristics in Temporal Graphscited by 11
- 2020Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Edge Streamscited by 7
- 2023Temporal graph models fail to capture global temporal dynamicscited by 5
- 2024Three Revisits to Node-Level Graph Anomaly Detection: Outliers, Message Passing and Hyperbolic Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2025Weisfeiler and Leman Follow the Arrow of Time: Expressive Power of Message Passing in Temporal Event Graphscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.