Three Revisits to Node-Level Graph Anomaly Detection: Outliers, Message Passing and Hyperbolic Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph anomaly detection plays a vital role for identifying abnormal instances in complex networks. Despite advancements of methodology based on deep learning in recent years, existing benchmarking approaches exhibit limitations that hinder a comprehensive comparison. In this paper, we revisit datasets and approaches for unsupervised node-level graph anomaly detection tasks from three aspects. Firstly, we introduce outlier injection methods that create more diverse and graph-based anomalies in graph datasets. Secondly, we compare methods employing message passing against those without, uncovering the unexpected decline in performance associated with message passing. Thirdly, we explore the use of hyperbolic neural networks, specifying crucial architecture and loss design that contribute to enhanced performance. Through rigorous experiments and evaluations, our study sheds light on general strategies for improving node-level graph anomaly detection methods.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.
Builds on
32 of 58 references.
References · 32
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
- 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
- 2019GraphSAINT: Graph Sampling Based Inductive Learning Methodcited by 618
- 2019Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological Viewcited by 544
- 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 543
- 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 400
- 2018Hyperbolic Neural Networkscited by 393
- 2019PairNorm: Tackling Oversmoothing in GNNscited by 297
20 more
- 2018Learning Continuous Hierarchies in the Lorentz Model of Hyperbolic Geometrycited by 261
- 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 248
- 2020A Note on Over-Smoothing for Graph Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2019Hyperbolic Graph Neural Networkscited by 244
- 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection with Deep Learningcited by 230
- 2018Representation Tradeoffs for Hyperbolic Embeddingscited by 204
- 2018Riemannian Adaptive Optimization Methodscited by 187
- 2018Poincar'e GloVe: Hyperbolic Word Embeddingscited by 155
- 2021Hyperbolic Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 138
- 2021Fully Hyperbolic Neural Networkscited by 107
- 2022Transformer for Graphs: An Overview from Architecture Perspectivecited by 107
- 2019Constant Curvature Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 106
- 2020AnomalyDAE: Dual autoencoder for anomaly detection on attributed networkscited by 81
- 2022BOND: Benchmarking Unsupervised Outlier Node Detection on Static Attributed Graphscited by 80
- 2016Hiding Individuals and Communities in a Social Networkcited by 77
- 2021Lorentzian Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 66
- 2021A Hyperbolic-to-Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Networkcited by 53
- 2020Differentiating through the Fr'echet Meancited by 52
- 2020Tree! I am no Tree! I am a Low Dimensional Hyperbolic Embeddingcited by 36
- 2022HICF: Hyperbolic Informative Collaborative Filteringcited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.